diff options
author | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> | 2017-10-27 10:28:55 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> | 2017-11-10 03:45:06 -0500 |
commit | ed8703a506a8241f921feb63a656d0ff5a090895 (patch) | |
tree | 499298167ce377288060a8041735c1b11ca898a9 | |
parent | a75460547e13c99762c2f9dbfcdd13ad416f91c5 (diff) |
KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Theory of operations
Yet another braindump so I can free some cells...
Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
-rw-r--r-- | virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c | 67 |
1 files changed, 67 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c index bf874dd01fc0..915d09dc2638 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c | |||
@@ -23,6 +23,73 @@ | |||
23 | 23 | ||
24 | #include "vgic.h" | 24 | #include "vgic.h" |
25 | 25 | ||
26 | /* | ||
27 | * How KVM uses GICv4 (insert rude comments here): | ||
28 | * | ||
29 | * The vgic-v4 layer acts as a bridge between several entities: | ||
30 | * - The GICv4 ITS representation offered by the ITS driver | ||
31 | * - VFIO, which is in charge of the PCI endpoint | ||
32 | * - The virtual ITS, which is the only thing the guest sees | ||
33 | * | ||
34 | * The configuration of VLPIs is triggered by a callback from VFIO, | ||
35 | * instructing KVM that a PCI device has been configured to deliver | ||
36 | * MSIs to a vITS. | ||
37 | * | ||
38 | * kvm_vgic_v4_set_forwarding() is thus called with the routing entry, | ||
39 | * and this is used to find the corresponding vITS data structures | ||
40 | * (ITS instance, device, event and irq) using a process that is | ||
41 | * extremely similar to the injection of an MSI. | ||
42 | * | ||
43 | * At this stage, we can link the guest's view of an LPI (uniquely | ||
44 | * identified by the routing entry) and the host irq, using the GICv4 | ||
45 | * driver mapping operation. Should the mapping succeed, we've then | ||
46 | * successfully upgraded the guest's LPI to a VLPI. We can then start | ||
47 | * with updating GICv4's view of the property table and generating an | ||
48 | * INValidation in order to kickstart the delivery of this VLPI to the | ||
49 | * guest directly, without software intervention. Well, almost. | ||
50 | * | ||
51 | * When the PCI endpoint is deconfigured, this operation is reversed | ||
52 | * with VFIO calling kvm_vgic_v4_unset_forwarding(). | ||
53 | * | ||
54 | * Once the VLPI has been mapped, it needs to follow any change the | ||
55 | * guest performs on its LPI through the vITS. For that, a number of | ||
56 | * command handlers have hooks to communicate these changes to the HW: | ||
57 | * - Any invalidation triggers a call to its_prop_update_vlpi() | ||
58 | * - The INT command results in a irq_set_irqchip_state(), which | ||
59 | * generates an INT on the corresponding VLPI. | ||
60 | * - The CLEAR command results in a irq_set_irqchip_state(), which | ||
61 | * generates an CLEAR on the corresponding VLPI. | ||
62 | * - DISCARD translates into an unmap, similar to a call to | ||
63 | * kvm_vgic_v4_unset_forwarding(). | ||
64 | * - MOVI is translated by an update of the existing mapping, changing | ||
65 | * the target vcpu, resulting in a VMOVI being generated. | ||
66 | * - MOVALL is translated by a string of mapping updates (similar to | ||
67 | * the handling of MOVI). MOVALL is horrible. | ||
68 | * | ||
69 | * Note that a DISCARD/MAPTI sequence emitted from the guest without | ||
70 | * reprogramming the PCI endpoint after MAPTI does not result in a | ||
71 | * VLPI being mapped, as there is no callback from VFIO (the guest | ||
72 | * will get the interrupt via the normal SW injection). Fixing this is | ||
73 | * not trivial, and requires some horrible messing with the VFIO | ||
74 | * internals. Not fun. Don't do that. | ||
75 | * | ||
76 | * Then there is the scheduling. Each time a vcpu is about to run on a | ||
77 | * physical CPU, KVM must tell the corresponding redistributor about | ||
78 | * it. And if we've migrated our vcpu from one CPU to another, we must | ||
79 | * tell the ITS (so that the messages reach the right redistributor). | ||
80 | * This is done in two steps: first issue a irq_set_affinity() on the | ||
81 | * irq corresponding to the vcpu, then call its_schedule_vpe(). You | ||
82 | * must be in a non-preemptible context. On exit, another call to | ||
83 | * its_schedule_vpe() tells the redistributor that we're done with the | ||
84 | * vcpu. | ||
85 | * | ||
86 | * Finally, the doorbell handling: Each vcpu is allocated an interrupt | ||
87 | * which will fire each time a VLPI is made pending whilst the vcpu is | ||
88 | * not running. Each time the vcpu gets blocked, the doorbell | ||
89 | * interrupt gets enabled. When the vcpu is unblocked (for whatever | ||
90 | * reason), the doorbell interrupt is disabled. | ||
91 | */ | ||
92 | |||
26 | #define DB_IRQ_FLAGS (IRQ_NOAUTOEN | IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY | IRQ_NO_BALANCING) | 93 | #define DB_IRQ_FLAGS (IRQ_NOAUTOEN | IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY | IRQ_NO_BALANCING) |
27 | 94 | ||
28 | static irqreturn_t vgic_v4_doorbell_handler(int irq, void *info) | 95 | static irqreturn_t vgic_v4_doorbell_handler(int irq, void *info) |