1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|
# Documentation Mapping DIS Stressmark Parameters to WSS
## Field
1 allocation in main()
f = 1st input param
sizeof(unsigned char) * f
## Matrix
6 allocations in main(), 7 allocations in biConjugateGradient()
*Allocations in main()*
dim = 2nd input param
numberNonzero = 3nd input param
sizeof(double) * (dim^2+3dim+numberNonzero) + sizeof(int) * (2dim+1+numberNonzero)
*Allocations in biConjugateGradient()*
sizeof(double) * 7dim
## Neighborhood
1 allocation in createImage, 2 allocations in neighborhoodCalculation
*Allocations in createImage()*
dimension = 3rd input param
sizeof(short int) * dimension^2
*Allocations in neighborhoodCalculation()*
bitDepth = 2nd param
sizeof(int) * (2^(bitDepth + 1) - 1)
## Pointer
n = 5th input param
f = 1st input param
sizeof(unsigned int) * 4n + sizeof(int) * f
## Transitive
n = 1st input param
sizeof(unsigned int) * 2n^2
## Update
f = 1st input param
sizeof(int) * f
## Testplan
*Problem!* Larger WSS = more computations
Use testcase #1 for non-specified parameters
Below math computed for x86_64
- Test WSS at powers of 2: 16 KiB, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1MiB, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32
- For each WSS, measure cache allocation of 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16
### Field
Just vary first param
f = WSS
### Matrix
0.3 - 16% number nonzero
- Fixed at 8%
Just vary dim (matrix size)
sizeof(double) * (dim^2+10dim+numberNonzero) + sizeof(int) * (2dim+1+numberNonzero) = WSS
### Neighborhood
8 or 15 bit depth
- Fix at 12?
Just vary dim (image size)
### Pointer
10 for n
Just vary f
### Transitive
Just vary n
### Update
Just vary f
|
