| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The simple panel driver's ->get_modes() implementation calculates the
display mode list from the typical timings and the ->get_timings()
implementation returns the timings to the connected encoder for mode
validation and fixup.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
[treding@nvidia.com: select VIDEOMODE_HELPERS]
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The simple panel code uses the backlight interface to
find a device, which fails when backlight is disabled:
drivers/built-in.o: In function `panel_simple_platform_probe':
:(.text+0xd3c48): undefined reference to `of_find_backlight_by_node'
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The sharp panel code uses the backlight interface to
find a device, which fails when backlight is disabled:
drivers/built-in.o: In function `sharp_panel_probe':
:(.text+0x5ceac): undefined reference to `of_find_backlight_by_node'
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This panel requires dual-channel mode. The device accepts command-mode
data on 8 lanes and will therefore need a dual-channel DSI controller.
The two interfaces that make up this device need to be instantiated in
the controllers that gang up to provide the dual-channel DSI host.
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rather than DRM_PANEL_LD9040 selecting SPI, which then results in an
increase in the probability of Kconf reporting circular dependencies
(we're one "select" away from that right now), make this depend on
SPI instead. This is akin to having some driver select DRM.
Having some drivers depend on a subsystem, and other drivers select a
subsystem is a recipe for circular dependencies, and there's really no
need for it.
The potential circular dependency (which can be caused today by the
addition of selecting DRM_PANEL from DRM_IMX_LDB) is:
symbol DMADEVICES is selected by SAMSUNG_DMADEV
symbol SAMSUNG_DMADEV is selected by S3C64XX_PL080
symbol S3C64XX_PL080 is selected by SPI_S3C64XX
symbol SPI_S3C64XX depends on SPI
symbol SPI is selected by DRM_PANEL_LD9040
symbol DRM_PANEL_LD9040 depends on DRM_PANEL
symbol DRM_PANEL is selected by DRM_IMX_LDB
symbol DRM_IMX_LDB depends on MFD_SYSCON
symbol MFD_SYSCON is selected by POWER_RESET_KEYSTONE
symbol POWER_RESET_KEYSTONE depends on POWER_SUPPLY
symbol POWER_SUPPLY is selected by HID_SONY
symbol HID_SONY depends on NEW_LEDS
symbol NEW_LEDS is selected by BACKLIGHT_ADP8860
symbol BACKLIGHT_ADP8860 depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE
symbol BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE is selected by FB_MX3
symbol FB_MX3 depends on MX3_IPU
symbol MX3_IPU depends on DMADEVICES
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
DRM_PANEL_LD9040 and DRM_PANEL_S6E8AA0 both explicitly depended on
DRM_PANEL && DRM, whereas DRM_PANEL_SIMPLE relies upon the dependency
on the menu.
We do not need to use explicit dependencies if we make the menu depend
on DRM_PANEL && DRM - this will implicitly make each entry in the menu
depend on DRM_PANEL && DRM without this needing to be explicitly stated
against every entry.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The patch adds MIPI-DSI based S6E8AA0 AMOLED LCD panel driver.
Driver uses mipi_dsi bus to communicate with panel and exposes drm_panel
interface.
v2
- added bus error handling,
- set maxmimum DSI packet size on init,
- removed unsupported brightness drm_panel callbacks,
- minor improvements
v3
- switched to gpiod framework,
- minor fixes in error handling
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The patch adds LD9040 parallel RGB panel driver with SPI control interface.
The driver uses drm_panel framework.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a driver for simple panels. Such panels can have a regulator that
provides the supply voltage and a separate GPIO to enable the panel.
Optionally the panels can have a backlight associated with them so it
can be enabled or disabled according to the panel's power management
mode.
Support is added for two panels: An AU Optronics 10.1" WSVGA and a
Chunghwa Picture Tubes 10.1" WXGA panel.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
|
|
|
Add a very simple framework to register and lookup panels. Panel drivers
can initialize a DRM panel and register it with the framework, allowing
them to be retrieved and used by display drivers. Currently only support
for DPMS and obtaining panel modes is provided. However it should be
sufficient to enable a large number of panels. The framework should also
be easily extensible to support more sophisticated kinds of panels such
as DSI.
The framework hasn't been tied into the DRM core, even though it should
be easily possible to do so if that's what we want. In the current
implementation, display drivers can simple make use of it to retrieve a
panel, obtain its modes and control its DPMS mode.
Note that this is currently only tested on systems that boot from a
device tree. No glue code has been written yet for systems that use
platform data, but it should be easy to add.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
|
