1 files changed, 24 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
index 0a44b90602b0..146bb6218eec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
@@ -26,7 +26,8 @@
  *      contact AMD for precise details and a CPU swap.
  *
  *      See     http://www.multimania.com/poulot/k6bug.html
- *              http://www.amd.com/K6/k6docs/revgd.html
+ *      and     section 2.6.2 of "AMD-K6 Processor Revision Guide - Model 6"
+ *              (Publication # 21266  Issue Date: August 1998)
  *
  *      The following test is erm.. interesting. AMD neglected to up
  *      the chip setting when fixing the bug but they also tweaked some
@@ -94,7 +95,6 @@ static void __cpuinit init_amd_k6(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
                                 "system stability may be impaired when more than 32 MB are used.\n");
                 else
                         printk(KERN_CONT "probably OK (after B9730xxxx).\n");
-                printk(KERN_INFO "Please see http://membres.lycos.fr/poulot/k6bug.html\n");
         }
 
         /* K6 with old style WHCR */
@@ -353,10 +353,11 @@ static void __cpuinit srat_detect_node(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
                 node = per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu);
 
         /*
-         * If core numbers are inconsistent, it's likely a multi-fabric platform,
-         * so invoke platform-specific handler
+         * On multi-fabric platform (e.g. Numascale NumaChip) a
+         * platform-specific handler needs to be called to fixup some
+         * IDs of the CPU.
          */
-        if (c->phys_proc_id != node)
+        if (x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id)
                 x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id(c, node);
 
         if (!node_online(node)) {
@@ -579,6 +580,24 @@ static void __cpuinit init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
                 }
         }
 
+        /* re-enable TopologyExtensions if switched off by BIOS */
+        if ((c->x86 == 0x15) &&
+            (c->x86_model >= 0x10) && (c->x86_model <= 0x1f) &&
+            !cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT)) {
+                u64 val;
+
+                if (!rdmsrl_amd_safe(0xc0011005, &val)) {
+                        val |= 1ULL << 54;
+                        wrmsrl_amd_safe(0xc0011005, val);
+                        rdmsrl(0xc0011005, val);
+                        if (val & (1ULL << 54)) {
+                                set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT);
+                                printk(KERN_INFO FW_INFO "CPU: Re-enabling "
+                                  "disabled Topology Extensions Support\n");
+                        }
+                }
+        }
+
         cpu_detect_cache_sizes(c);
 
         /* Multi core CPU? */