aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/virt/kvm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIgor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>2014-12-01 12:29:27 -0500
committerPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>2014-12-04 09:29:11 -0500
commit9c1a5d38780e652275aa55362dbee0d7e827e069 (patch)
tree0fc252e3948a30b78974e3ba8979d5aa231de22f /virt/kvm
parent0e60b0799fedc495a5c57dbd669de3c10d72edd2 (diff)
kvm: optimize GFN to memslot lookup with large slots amount
Current linear search doesn't scale well when large amount of memslots is used and looked up slot is not in the beginning memslots array. Taking in account that memslots don't overlap, it's possible to switch sorting order of memslots array from 'npages' to 'base_gfn' and use binary search for memslot lookup by GFN. As result of switching to binary search lookup times are reduced with large amount of memslots. Following is a table of search_memslot() cycles during WS2008R2 guest boot. boot, boot + ~10 min mostly same of using it, slot lookup randomized lookup max average average cycles cycles cycles 13 slots : 1450 28 30 13 slots : 1400 30 40 binary search 117 slots : 13000 30 460 117 slots : 2000 35 180 binary search Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'virt/kvm')
-rw-r--r--virt/kvm/kvm_main.c8
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 162817f853ec..759af6596a07 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -679,8 +679,14 @@ static void update_memslots(struct kvm_memslots *slots,
679 struct kvm_memory_slot *mslots = slots->memslots; 679 struct kvm_memory_slot *mslots = slots->memslots;
680 680
681 WARN_ON(mslots[i].id != id); 681 WARN_ON(mslots[i].id != id);
682 if (!new->npages) 682 if (!new->npages) {
683 new->base_gfn = 0; 683 new->base_gfn = 0;
684 if (mslots[i].npages)
685 slots->used_slots--;
686 } else {
687 if (!mslots[i].npages)
688 slots->used_slots++;
689 }
684 690
685 while (i < KVM_MEM_SLOTS_NUM - 1 && 691 while (i < KVM_MEM_SLOTS_NUM - 1 &&
686 new->base_gfn <= mslots[i + 1].base_gfn) { 692 new->base_gfn <= mslots[i + 1].base_gfn) {