ASoC: wm8904: Fix wrong value references for boolean kctl

The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c
index d3b3f57668cc..215e93c1ddf0 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c
@@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ static int wm8904_get_deemph(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
         struct snd_soc_codec *codec = snd_soc_kcontrol_codec(kcontrol);
         struct wm8904_priv *wm8904 = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec);
 
-        ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] = wm8904->deemph;
+        ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = wm8904->deemph;
         return 0;
 }
 
@@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ static int wm8904_put_deemph(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 {
         struct snd_soc_codec *codec = snd_soc_kcontrol_codec(kcontrol);
         struct wm8904_priv *wm8904 = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec);
-        int deemph = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0];
+        int deemph = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0];
 
         if (deemph > 1)
                 return -EINVAL;