Apparmor: Use d_is_positive/negative() rather than testing dentry->d_inode

Use d_is_positive(dentry) or d_is_negative(dentry) rather than testing
dentry->d_inode as the dentry may cover another layer that has an inode when
the top layer doesn't or may hold a 0,0 chardev that's actually a whiteout.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/security/apparmor/path.c b/security/apparmor/path.c
index 35b394a75d76..71e0e3a15b9d 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/path.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/path.c
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static int d_namespace_path(struct path *path, char *buf, int buflen,
          *    security_path hooks as a deleted dentry except without an inode
          *    allocated.
          */
-        if (d_unlinked(path->dentry) && path->dentry->d_inode &&
+        if (d_unlinked(path->dentry) && d_is_positive(path->dentry) &&
             !(flags & PATH_MEDIATE_DELETED)) {
                         error = -ENOENT;
                         goto out;