[ICSK]: Introduce reqsk_queue_prune from code in tcp_synack_timer

With this we're very close to getting all of the current TCP
refactorings in my dccp-2.6 tree merged, next changeset will export
some functions needed by the current DCCP code and then dccp-2.6.git
will be born!

Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
index 4cfbe1d1c920..2d95afe5b393 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
@@ -787,9 +787,10 @@ struct sock *tcp_check_req(struct sock *sk,struct sk_buff *skb,
            does sequence test, SYN is truncated, and thus we consider
            it a bare ACK.
 
-           If tp->defer_accept, we silently drop this bare ACK.  Otherwise,
-           we create an established connection.  Both ends (listening sockets)
-           accept the new incoming connection and try to talk to each other. 8-)
+           If icsk->icsk_accept_queue.rskq_defer_accept, we silently drop this
+           bare ACK.  Otherwise, we create an established connection.  Both
+           ends (listening sockets) accept the new incoming connection and try
+           to talk to each other. 8-)
 
            Note: This case is both harmless, and rare.  Possibility is about the
            same as us discovering intelligent life on another plant tomorrow.
@@ -856,7 +857,8 @@ struct sock *tcp_check_req(struct sock *sk,struct sk_buff *skb,
                         return NULL;
 
                 /* If TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT is set, drop bare ACK. */
-                if (tp->defer_accept && TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq == tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn + 1) {
+                if (inet_csk(sk)->icsk_accept_queue.rskq_defer_accept &&
+                    TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq == tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn + 1) {
                         inet_rsk(req)->acked = 1;
                         return NULL;
                 }