diff options
| author | Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk> | 2006-10-24 19:17:51 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2006-10-24 19:17:51 -0400 |
| commit | 0e64e94e477f8ed04e9295b11a5898d443c28a47 (patch) | |
| tree | 0a02a3017d41a3a21038ff081b93b5b6359e1692 /net/dccp/ccids/Kconfig | |
| parent | 977a415f2b70b5693aaa23b1a16ad57ea20a1dce (diff) | |
[DCCP]: Update documentation references.
Updates the references to spec documents throughout the code, taking into
account that
* the DCCP, CCID 2, and CCID 3 drafts all became RFCs in March this year
* RFC 1063 was obsoleted by RFC 1191
* draft-ietf-tcpimpl-pmtud-0x.txt was published as an Informational
RFC, RFC 2923 on 2000-09-22.
All references verified.
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/dccp/ccids/Kconfig')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/dccp/ccids/Kconfig | 17 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/net/dccp/ccids/Kconfig b/net/dccp/ccids/Kconfig index 32752f750447..8533dabfb9f8 100644 --- a/net/dccp/ccids/Kconfig +++ b/net/dccp/ccids/Kconfig | |||
| @@ -22,11 +22,11 @@ config IP_DCCP_CCID2 | |||
| 22 | for lost packets, would prefer CCID 2 to CCID 3. On-line games may | 22 | for lost packets, would prefer CCID 2 to CCID 3. On-line games may |
| 23 | also prefer CCID 2. | 23 | also prefer CCID 2. |
| 24 | 24 | ||
| 25 | CCID 2 is further described in: | 25 | CCID 2 is further described in RFC 4341, |
| 26 | http://www.icir.org/kohler/dccp/draft-ietf-dccp-ccid2-10.txt | 26 | http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4341.txt |
| 27 | 27 | ||
| 28 | This text was extracted from: | 28 | This text was extracted from RFC 4340 (sec. 10.1), |
| 29 | http://www.icir.org/kohler/dccp/draft-ietf-dccp-spec-13.txt | 29 | http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4340.txt |
| 30 | 30 | ||
| 31 | If in doubt, say M. | 31 | If in doubt, say M. |
| 32 | 32 | ||
| @@ -53,15 +53,14 @@ config IP_DCCP_CCID3 | |||
| 53 | suitable than CCID 2 for applications such streaming media where a | 53 | suitable than CCID 2 for applications such streaming media where a |
| 54 | relatively smooth sending rate is of importance. | 54 | relatively smooth sending rate is of importance. |
| 55 | 55 | ||
| 56 | CCID 3 is further described in: | 56 | CCID 3 is further described in RFC 4342, |
| 57 | 57 | http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4342.txt | |
| 58 | http://www.icir.org/kohler/dccp/draft-ietf-dccp-ccid3-11.txt. | ||
| 59 | 58 | ||
| 60 | The TFRC congestion control algorithms were initially described in | 59 | The TFRC congestion control algorithms were initially described in |
| 61 | RFC 3448. | 60 | RFC 3448. |
| 62 | 61 | ||
| 63 | This text was extracted from: | 62 | This text was extracted from RFC 4340 (sec. 10.2), |
| 64 | http://www.icir.org/kohler/dccp/draft-ietf-dccp-spec-13.txt | 63 | http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4340.txt |
| 65 | 64 | ||
| 66 | If in doubt, say M. | 65 | If in doubt, say M. |
| 67 | 66 | ||