memblock: Make memblock_alloc_[try_]nid() top-down

NUMA aware memblock alloc functions - memblock_alloc_[try_]nid() -
weren't properly top-down because memblock_nid_range() scanned
forward.  This patch reverses memblock_nid_range(), renames it to
memblock_nid_range_rev() and updates related functions to implement
proper top-down allocation.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310460395-30913-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>

1 files changed, 11 insertions, 18 deletions

diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 22cd999b0d4e..447cf64304ba 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -499,27 +499,26 @@ phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align)
 
 
 /*
- * Additional node-local allocators. Search for node memory is bottom up
- * and walks memblock regions within that node bottom-up as well, but allocation
- * within an memblock region is top-down. XXX I plan to fix that at some stage
+ * Additional node-local top-down allocators.
  *
  * WARNING: Only available after early_node_map[] has been populated,
  * on some architectures, that is after all the calls to add_active_range()
  * have been done to populate it.
  */
 
-static phys_addr_t __init memblock_nid_range(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end, int *nid)
+static phys_addr_t __init memblock_nid_range_rev(phys_addr_t start,
+                                                 phys_addr_t end, int *nid)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP
         unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
         int i;
 
         for_each_mem_pfn_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &start_pfn, &end_pfn, nid)
-                if (start >= PFN_PHYS(start_pfn) && start < PFN_PHYS(end_pfn))
-                        return min(end, PFN_PHYS(end_pfn));
+                if (end > PFN_PHYS(start_pfn) && end <= PFN_PHYS(end_pfn))
+                        return max(start, PFN_PHYS(start_pfn));
 #endif
         *nid = 0;
-        return end;
+        return start;
 }
 
 static phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_nid_region(struct memblock_region *mp,
@@ -531,21 +530,19 @@ static phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_nid_region(struct memblock_region *mp,
         start = mp->base;
         end = start + mp->size;
 
-        start = round_up(start, align);
         while (start < end) {
-                phys_addr_t this_end;
+                phys_addr_t this_start;
                 int this_nid;
 
-                this_end = memblock_nid_range(start, end, &this_nid);
+                this_start = memblock_nid_range_rev(start, end, &this_nid);
                 if (this_nid == nid) {
-                        phys_addr_t ret = memblock_find_region(start, this_end, size, align);
+                        phys_addr_t ret = memblock_find_region(this_start, end, size, align);
                         if (ret &&
                             !memblock_add_region(&memblock.reserved, ret, size))
                                 return ret;
                 }
-                start = this_end;
+                end = this_start;
         }
-
         return 0;
 }
 
@@ -561,11 +558,7 @@ phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int n
          */
         size = round_up(size, align);
 
-        /* We do a bottom-up search for a region with the right
-         * nid since that's easier considering how memblock_nid_range()
-         * works
-         */
-        for (i = 0; i < mem->cnt; i++) {
+        for (i = mem->cnt - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
                 phys_addr_t ret = memblock_alloc_nid_region(&mem->regions[i],
                                                size, align, nid);
                 if (ret)