diff options
author | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> | 2008-02-13 18:58:36 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> | 2008-02-14 16:08:30 -0500 |
commit | 63070a79ba482c274bad10ac8c4b587a3e011f2c (patch) | |
tree | 1ecb5e104d343d3e533b2469c54e6a1bcb19a9ac /kernel | |
parent | 5a7780e725d1bb4c3094fcc12f1c5c5faea1e988 (diff) |
hrtimer: catch expired CLOCK_REALTIME timers early
A CLOCK_REALTIME timer, which has an absolute expiry time less than
the clock realtime offset calls with a negative delta into the clock
events code and triggers the WARN_ON() there.
This is a false positive and needs to be prevented. Check the result
of timer->expires - timer->base->offset right away and return -ETIME
right away.
Thanks to Frans Pop, who reported the problem and tested the fixes.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/hrtimer.c | 11 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/hrtimer.c b/kernel/hrtimer.c index c2893af9479e..98bee013f71f 100644 --- a/kernel/hrtimer.c +++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c | |||
@@ -442,6 +442,8 @@ static int hrtimer_reprogram(struct hrtimer *timer, | |||
442 | ktime_t expires = ktime_sub(timer->expires, base->offset); | 442 | ktime_t expires = ktime_sub(timer->expires, base->offset); |
443 | int res; | 443 | int res; |
444 | 444 | ||
445 | WARN_ON_ONCE(timer->expires.tv64 < 0); | ||
446 | |||
445 | /* | 447 | /* |
446 | * When the callback is running, we do not reprogram the clock event | 448 | * When the callback is running, we do not reprogram the clock event |
447 | * device. The timer callback is either running on a different CPU or | 449 | * device. The timer callback is either running on a different CPU or |
@@ -452,6 +454,15 @@ static int hrtimer_reprogram(struct hrtimer *timer, | |||
452 | if (hrtimer_callback_running(timer)) | 454 | if (hrtimer_callback_running(timer)) |
453 | return 0; | 455 | return 0; |
454 | 456 | ||
457 | /* | ||
458 | * CLOCK_REALTIME timer might be requested with an absolute | ||
459 | * expiry time which is less than base->offset. Nothing wrong | ||
460 | * about that, just avoid to call into the tick code, which | ||
461 | * has now objections against negative expiry values. | ||
462 | */ | ||
463 | if (expires.tv64 < 0) | ||
464 | return -ETIME; | ||
465 | |||
455 | if (expires.tv64 >= expires_next->tv64) | 466 | if (expires.tv64 >= expires_next->tv64) |
456 | return 0; | 467 | return 0; |
457 | 468 | ||