rcu: Provide grace-period piggybacking API

The following pattern is currently not well supported by RCU:

1.	Make data element inaccessible to RCU readers.

2.	Do work that probably lasts for more than one grace period.

3.	Do something to make sure RCU readers in flight before #1 above
	have completed.

Here are some things that could currently be done:

a.	Do a synchronize_rcu() unconditionally at either #1 or #3 above.
	This works, but imposes needless work and latency.

b.	Post an RCU callback at #1 above that does a wakeup, then
	wait for the wakeup at #3.  This works well, but likely results
	in an extra unneeded grace period.  Open-coding this is also
	a bit more semi-tricky code than would be good.

This commit therefore adds get_state_synchronize_rcu() and
cond_synchronize_rcu() APIs.  Call get_state_synchronize_rcu() at #1
above and pass its return value to cond_synchronize_rcu() at #3 above.
This results in a call to synchronize_rcu() if no grace period has
elapsed between #1 and #3, but requires only a load, comparison, and
memory barrier if a full grace period did elapse.

Requested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

1 files changed, 58 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 351faba48b91..0c47e300210a 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1421,13 +1421,14 @@ static int rcu_gp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 
         /* Advance to a new grace period and initialize state. */
         record_gp_stall_check_time(rsp);
-        smp_wmb(); /* Record GP times before starting GP. */
-        rsp->gpnum++;
+        /* Record GP times before starting GP, hence smp_store_release(). */
+        smp_store_release(&rsp->gpnum, rsp->gpnum + 1);
         trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, rsp->gpnum, TPS("start"));
         raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
 
         /* Exclude any concurrent CPU-hotplug operations. */
         mutex_lock(&rsp->onoff_mutex);
+        smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(); /* ->gpnum increment before GP! */
 
         /*
          * Set the quiescent-state-needed bits in all the rcu_node
@@ -1555,10 +1556,11 @@ static void rcu_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp)
         }
         rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
         raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
-        smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+        smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(); /* Order GP before ->completed update. */
         rcu_nocb_gp_set(rnp, nocb);
 
-        rsp->completed = rsp->gpnum; /* Declare grace period done. */
+        /* Declare grace period done. */
+        ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->completed) = rsp->gpnum;
         trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, rsp->completed, TPS("end"));
         rsp->fqs_state = RCU_GP_IDLE;
         rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
@@ -2637,6 +2639,58 @@ void synchronize_rcu_bh(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu_bh);
 
+/**
+ * get_state_synchronize_rcu - Snapshot current RCU state
+ *
+ * Returns a cookie that is used by a later call to cond_synchronize_rcu()
+ * to determine whether or not a full grace period has elapsed in the
+ * meantime.
+ */
+unsigned long get_state_synchronize_rcu(void)
+{
+        /*
+         * Any prior manipulation of RCU-protected data must happen
+         * before the load from ->gpnum.
+         */
+        smp_mb();  /* ^^^ */
+
+        /*
+         * Make sure this load happens before the purportedly
+         * time-consuming work between get_state_synchronize_rcu()
+         * and cond_synchronize_rcu().
+         */
+        return smp_load_acquire(&rcu_state->gpnum);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_state_synchronize_rcu);
+
+/**
+ * cond_synchronize_rcu - Conditionally wait for an RCU grace period
+ *
+ * @oldstate: return value from earlier call to get_state_synchronize_rcu()
+ *
+ * If a full RCU grace period has elapsed since the earlier call to
+ * get_state_synchronize_rcu(), just return.  Otherwise, invoke
+ * synchronize_rcu() to wait for a full grace period.
+ *
+ * Yes, this function does not take counter wrap into account.  But
+ * counter wrap is harmless.  If the counter wraps, we have waited for
+ * more than 2 billion grace periods (and way more on a 64-bit system!),
+ * so waiting for one additional grace period should be just fine.
+ */
+void cond_synchronize_rcu(unsigned long oldstate)
+{
+        unsigned long newstate;
+
+        /*
+         * Ensure that this load happens before any RCU-destructive
+         * actions the caller might carry out after we return.
+         */
+        newstate = smp_load_acquire(&rcu_state->completed);
+        if (ULONG_CMP_GE(oldstate, newstate))
+                synchronize_rcu();
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cond_synchronize_rcu);
+
 static int synchronize_sched_expedited_cpu_stop(void *data)
 {
         /*