aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp>2009-06-17 19:26:23 -0400
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2009-06-18 16:03:45 -0400
commit6f3f1cb21f08fbf757bbbbb0709ee515a7a7c6ad (patch)
treec6874d850ab2347dfeb58ea95a05422880fc0892 /fs
parente8ef7aaea79a899be4d7f50e829900c0ce15e52f (diff)
jbd: clean up journal_try_to_free_buffers()
I delete the following patch "commit 3f31fddfa26b7594b44ff2b34f9a04ba409e0f91 Author: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Date: Fri Jul 25 01:46:22 2008 -0700 jbd: fix race between free buffer and commit transaction This patch is no longer needed because if race between freeing buffer and committing transaction functionality occurs and dio gets error, currently dio falls back to buffered IO by the following patch. commit 6ccfa806a9cfbbf1cd43d5b6aa47ef2c0eb518fd Author: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp> Date: Tue Sep 2 14:35:40 2008 -0700 VFS: fix dio write returning EIO when try_to_release_page fails Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
-rw-r--r--fs/jbd/transaction.c48
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 48 deletions
diff --git a/fs/jbd/transaction.c b/fs/jbd/transaction.c
index ed886e6db399..73242ba7c7b1 100644
--- a/fs/jbd/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/jbd/transaction.c
@@ -1686,35 +1686,6 @@ out:
1686 return; 1686 return;
1687} 1687}
1688 1688
1689/*
1690 * journal_try_to_free_buffers() could race with journal_commit_transaction()
1691 * The latter might still hold the a count on buffers when inspecting
1692 * them on t_syncdata_list or t_locked_list.
1693 *
1694 * journal_try_to_free_buffers() will call this function to
1695 * wait for the current transaction to finish syncing data buffers, before
1696 * tryinf to free that buffer.
1697 *
1698 * Called with journal->j_state_lock held.
1699 */
1700static void journal_wait_for_transaction_sync_data(journal_t *journal)
1701{
1702 transaction_t *transaction = NULL;
1703 tid_t tid;
1704
1705 spin_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
1706 transaction = journal->j_committing_transaction;
1707
1708 if (!transaction) {
1709 spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
1710 return;
1711 }
1712
1713 tid = transaction->t_tid;
1714 spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
1715 log_wait_commit(journal, tid);
1716}
1717
1718/** 1689/**
1719 * int journal_try_to_free_buffers() - try to free page buffers. 1690 * int journal_try_to_free_buffers() - try to free page buffers.
1720 * @journal: journal for operation 1691 * @journal: journal for operation
@@ -1786,25 +1757,6 @@ int journal_try_to_free_buffers(journal_t *journal,
1786 1757
1787 ret = try_to_free_buffers(page); 1758 ret = try_to_free_buffers(page);
1788 1759
1789 /*
1790 * There are a number of places where journal_try_to_free_buffers()
1791 * could race with journal_commit_transaction(), the later still
1792 * holds the reference to the buffers to free while processing them.
1793 * try_to_free_buffers() failed to free those buffers. Some of the
1794 * caller of releasepage() request page buffers to be dropped, otherwise
1795 * treat the fail-to-free as errors (such as generic_file_direct_IO())
1796 *
1797 * So, if the caller of try_to_release_page() wants the synchronous
1798 * behaviour(i.e make sure buffers are dropped upon return),
1799 * let's wait for the current transaction to finish flush of
1800 * dirty data buffers, then try to free those buffers again,
1801 * with the journal locked.
1802 */
1803 if (ret == 0 && (gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT) && (gfp_mask & __GFP_FS)) {
1804 journal_wait_for_transaction_sync_data(journal);
1805 ret = try_to_free_buffers(page);
1806 }
1807
1808busy: 1760busy:
1809 return ret; 1761 return ret;
1810} 1762}