xfs: move allocation stack switch up to xfs_bmapi_allocate

Switching stacks are xfs_alloc_vextent can cause deadlocks when we
run out of worker threads on the allocation workqueue. This can
occur because xfs_bmap_btalloc can make multiple calls to
xfs_alloc_vextent() and even if xfs_alloc_vextent() fails it can
return with the AGF locked in the current allocation transaction.

If we then need to make another allocation, and all the allocation
worker contexts are exhausted because the are blocked waiting for
the AGF lock, holder of the AGF cannot get it's xfs-alloc_vextent
work completed to release the AGF.  Hence allocation effectively
deadlocks.

To avoid this, move the stack switch one layer up to
xfs_bmapi_allocate() so that all of the allocation attempts in a
single switched stack transaction occur in a single worker context.
This avoids the problem of an allocation being blocked waiting for
a worker thread whilst holding the AGF.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>

1 files changed, 49 insertions, 11 deletions

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c
index 91259554df8b..83d0cf3df930 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c
@@ -2441,7 +2441,6 @@ xfs_bmap_btalloc(
         args.tp = ap->tp;
         args.mp = mp;
         args.fsbno = ap->blkno;
-        args.stack_switch = ap->stack_switch;
 
         /* Trim the allocation back to the maximum an AG can fit. */
         args.maxlen = MIN(ap->length, XFS_ALLOC_AG_MAX_USABLE(mp));
@@ -4620,12 +4619,11 @@ xfs_bmapi_delay(
 
 
 STATIC int
-xfs_bmapi_allocate(
-        struct xfs_bmalloca     *bma,
-        int                     flags)
+__xfs_bmapi_allocate(
+        struct xfs_bmalloca     *bma)
 {
         struct xfs_mount        *mp = bma->ip->i_mount;
-        int                     whichfork = (flags & XFS_BMAPI_ATTRFORK) ?
+        int                     whichfork = (bma->flags & XFS_BMAPI_ATTRFORK) ?
                                                 XFS_ATTR_FORK : XFS_DATA_FORK;
         struct xfs_ifork        *ifp = XFS_IFORK_PTR(bma->ip, whichfork);
         int                     tmp_logflags = 0;
@@ -4658,25 +4656,25 @@ xfs_bmapi_allocate(
          * Indicate if this is the first user data in the file, or just any
          * user data.
          */
-        if (!(flags & XFS_BMAPI_METADATA)) {
+        if (!(bma->flags & XFS_BMAPI_METADATA)) {
                 bma->userdata = (bma->offset == 0) ?
                         XFS_ALLOC_INITIAL_USER_DATA : XFS_ALLOC_USERDATA;
         }
 
-        bma->minlen = (flags & XFS_BMAPI_CONTIG) ? bma->length : 1;
+        bma->minlen = (bma->flags & XFS_BMAPI_CONTIG) ? bma->length : 1;
 
         /*
          * Only want to do the alignment at the eof if it is userdata and
          * allocation length is larger than a stripe unit.
          */
         if (mp->m_dalign && bma->length >= mp->m_dalign &&
-            !(flags & XFS_BMAPI_METADATA) && whichfork == XFS_DATA_FORK) {
+            !(bma->flags & XFS_BMAPI_METADATA) && whichfork == XFS_DATA_FORK) {
                 error = xfs_bmap_isaeof(bma, whichfork);
                 if (error)
                         return error;
         }
 
-        if (flags & XFS_BMAPI_STACK_SWITCH)
+        if (bma->flags & XFS_BMAPI_STACK_SWITCH)
                 bma->stack_switch = 1;
 
         error = xfs_bmap_alloc(bma);
@@ -4713,7 +4711,7 @@ xfs_bmapi_allocate(
          * A wasdelay extent has been initialized, so shouldn't be flagged
          * as unwritten.
          */
-        if (!bma->wasdel && (flags & XFS_BMAPI_PREALLOC) &&
+        if (!bma->wasdel && (bma->flags & XFS_BMAPI_PREALLOC) &&
             xfs_sb_version_hasextflgbit(&mp->m_sb))
                 bma->got.br_state = XFS_EXT_UNWRITTEN;
 
@@ -4741,6 +4739,45 @@ xfs_bmapi_allocate(
         return 0;
 }
 
+static void
+xfs_bmapi_allocate_worker(
+        struct work_struct      *work)
+{
+        struct xfs_bmalloca     *args = container_of(work,
+                                                struct xfs_bmalloca, work);
+        unsigned long           pflags;
+
+        /* we are in a transaction context here */
+        current_set_flags_nested(&pflags, PF_FSTRANS);
+
+        args->result = __xfs_bmapi_allocate(args);
+        complete(args->done);
+
+        current_restore_flags_nested(&pflags, PF_FSTRANS);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Some allocation requests often come in with little stack to work on. Push
+ * them off to a worker thread so there is lots of stack to use. Otherwise just
+ * call directly to avoid the context switch overhead here.
+ */
+int
+xfs_bmapi_allocate(
+        struct xfs_bmalloca     *args)
+{
+        DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(done);
+
+        if (!args->stack_switch)
+                return __xfs_bmapi_allocate(args);
+
+
+        args->done = &done;
+        INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&args->work, xfs_bmapi_allocate_worker);
+        queue_work(xfs_alloc_wq, &args->work);
+        wait_for_completion(&done);
+        return args->result;
+}
+
 STATIC int
 xfs_bmapi_convert_unwritten(
         struct xfs_bmalloca     *bma,
@@ -4926,6 +4963,7 @@ xfs_bmapi_write(
                         bma.conv = !!(flags & XFS_BMAPI_CONVERT);
                         bma.wasdel = wasdelay;
                         bma.offset = bno;
+                        bma.flags = flags;
 
                         /*
                          * There's a 32/64 bit type mismatch between the
@@ -4941,7 +4979,7 @@ xfs_bmapi_write(
 
                         ASSERT(len > 0);
                         ASSERT(bma.length > 0);
-                        error = xfs_bmapi_allocate(&bma, flags);
+                        error = xfs_bmapi_allocate(&bma);
                         if (error)
                                 goto error0;
                         if (bma.blkno == NULLFSBLOCK)