don't expose I_NEW inodes via dentry->d_inode

	d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
	unlock_new_inode(inode);

is a bad idea; do it the other way round...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/fs/jfs/namei.c b/fs/jfs/namei.c
index c426293e16c1..3b91a7ad6086 100644
--- a/fs/jfs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/jfs/namei.c
@@ -176,8 +176,8 @@ static int jfs_create(struct inode *dip, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode,
                 unlock_new_inode(ip);
                 iput(ip);
         } else {
-                d_instantiate(dentry, ip);
                 unlock_new_inode(ip);
+                d_instantiate(dentry, ip);
         }
 
       out2:
@@ -309,8 +309,8 @@ static int jfs_mkdir(struct inode *dip, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode)
                 unlock_new_inode(ip);
                 iput(ip);
         } else {
-                d_instantiate(dentry, ip);
                 unlock_new_inode(ip);
+                d_instantiate(dentry, ip);
         }
 
       out2:
@@ -1043,8 +1043,8 @@ static int jfs_symlink(struct inode *dip, struct dentry *dentry,
                 unlock_new_inode(ip);
                 iput(ip);
         } else {
-                d_instantiate(dentry, ip);
                 unlock_new_inode(ip);
+                d_instantiate(dentry, ip);
         }
 
       out2:
@@ -1424,8 +1424,8 @@ static int jfs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
                 unlock_new_inode(ip);
                 iput(ip);
         } else {
-                d_instantiate(dentry, ip);
                 unlock_new_inode(ip);
+                d_instantiate(dentry, ip);
         }
 
       out1: