f2fs: fix por_doing variable coverage

The reason of using sbi->por_doing is to alleviate data writes during the
recovery.
The find_fsync_dnodes() produces some dirty dentry pages, so we should
cover it too with sbi->por_doing.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
index 294198775f8b..4d895149a6f0 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
@@ -381,6 +381,7 @@ int recover_fsync_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inode_list);
 
         /* step #1: find fsynced inode numbers */
+        sbi->por_doing = 1;
         err = find_fsync_dnodes(sbi, &inode_list);
         if (err)
                 goto out;
@@ -389,13 +390,12 @@ int recover_fsync_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
                 goto out;
 
         /* step #2: recover data */
-        sbi->por_doing = 1;
         err = recover_data(sbi, &inode_list, CURSEG_WARM_NODE);
-        sbi->por_doing = 0;
         BUG_ON(!list_empty(&inode_list));
 out:
         destroy_fsync_dnodes(sbi, &inode_list);
         kmem_cache_destroy(fsync_entry_slab);
+        sbi->por_doing = 0;
         write_checkpoint(sbi, false);
         return err;
 }