[DLM] fix leaking user locks

User NOQUEUE lock requests to a remote node that failed with -EAGAIN were
never being removed from a process's list of locks.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 16 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/fs/dlm/user.c b/fs/dlm/user.c
index 1f05960a916f..fd19caf9af97 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/user.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/user.c
@@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ void dlm_user_add_ast(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, int type)
         struct dlm_ls *ls;
         struct dlm_user_args *ua;
         struct dlm_user_proc *proc;
+        int remove_ownqueue = 0;
 
         /* dlm_clear_proc_locks() sets ORPHAN/DEAD flag on each
            lkb before dealing with it.  We need to check this
@@ -171,6 +172,14 @@ void dlm_user_add_ast(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, int type)
                 wake_up_interruptible(&proc->wait);
         }
 
+        /* noqueue requests that fail may need to be removed from the
+           proc's locks list, there should be a better way of detecting
+           this situation than checking all these things... */
+           
+        if (type == AST_COMP && lkb->lkb_grmode == DLM_LOCK_IV &&
+            ua->lksb.sb_status == -EAGAIN && !list_empty(&lkb->lkb_ownqueue))
+                remove_ownqueue = 1;
+
         /* We want to copy the lvb to userspace when the completion
            ast is read if the status is 0, the lock has an lvb and
            lvb_ops says we should.  We could probably have set_lvb_lock()
@@ -185,6 +194,13 @@ void dlm_user_add_ast(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, int type)
                 ua->update_user_lvb = 0;
 
         spin_unlock(&proc->asts_spin);
+
+        if (remove_ownqueue) {
+                spin_lock(&ua->proc->locks_spin);
+                list_del_init(&lkb->lkb_ownqueue);
+                spin_unlock(&ua->proc->locks_spin);
+                dlm_put_lkb(lkb);
+        }
  out:
         mutex_unlock(&ls->ls_clear_proc_locks);
 }