Btrfs: use i_version instead of our own sequence

We've been keeping around the inode sequence number in hopes that somebody
would use it, but nobody uses it and people actually use i_version which
serves the same purpose, so use i_version where we used the incore inode's
sequence number and that way the sequence is updated properly across the
board, and not just in file write.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
index c5f8fca4195f..bd6d143cea85 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ static int btrfs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb,
 #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL
         sb->s_flags |= MS_POSIXACL;
 #endif
-
+        sb->s_flags |= MS_I_VERSION;
         err = open_ctree(sb, fs_devices, (char *)data);
         if (err) {
                 printk("btrfs: open_ctree failed\n");