rxrpc: make the users of rxrpc_kernel_send_data() set kvec-backed msg_iter properly

Use iov_iter_kvec() there, get rid of set_fs() games - now that
rxrpc_send_data() uses iov_iter primitives, it'll handle ITER_KVEC just
fine.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c b/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
index 06e14bfb3496..dbc732e9a5c0 100644
--- a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
+++ b/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
@@ -306,8 +306,8 @@ static int afs_send_pages(struct afs_call *call, struct msghdr *msg,
 
                         _debug("- range %u-%u%s",
                                offset, to, msg->msg_flags ? " [more]" : "");
-                        iov_iter_init(&msg->msg_iter, WRITE,
-                                      (struct iovec *) iov, 1, to - offset);
+                        iov_iter_kvec(&msg->msg_iter, WRITE | ITER_KVEC,
+                                      iov, 1, to - offset);
 
                         /* have to change the state *before* sending the last
                          * packet as RxRPC might give us the reply before it
@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ int afs_make_call(struct in_addr *addr, struct afs_call *call, gfp_t gfp,
 
         msg.msg_name            = NULL;
         msg.msg_namelen         = 0;
-        iov_iter_init(&msg.msg_iter, WRITE, (struct iovec *)iov, 1,
+        iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, WRITE | ITER_KVEC, iov, 1,
                       call->request_size);
         msg.msg_control         = NULL;
         msg.msg_controllen      = 0;
@@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ static int afs_deliver_cm_op_id(struct afs_call *call, struct sk_buff *skb,
 void afs_send_empty_reply(struct afs_call *call)
 {
         struct msghdr msg;
-        struct iovec iov[1];
+        struct kvec iov[1];
 
         _enter("");
 
@@ -778,7 +778,7 @@ void afs_send_empty_reply(struct afs_call *call)
         iov[0].iov_len          = 0;
         msg.msg_name            = NULL;
         msg.msg_namelen         = 0;
-        iov_iter_init(&msg.msg_iter, WRITE, iov, 0, 0); /* WTF? */
+        iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, WRITE | ITER_KVEC, iov, 0, 0);     /* WTF? */
         msg.msg_control         = NULL;
         msg.msg_controllen      = 0;
         msg.msg_flags           = 0;
@@ -805,7 +805,7 @@ void afs_send_empty_reply(struct afs_call *call)
 void afs_send_simple_reply(struct afs_call *call, const void *buf, size_t len)
 {
         struct msghdr msg;
-        struct iovec iov[1];
+        struct kvec iov[1];
         int n;
 
         _enter("");
@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ void afs_send_simple_reply(struct afs_call *call, const void *buf, size_t len)
         iov[0].iov_len          = len;
         msg.msg_name            = NULL;
         msg.msg_namelen         = 0;
-        iov_iter_init(&msg.msg_iter, WRITE, iov, 1, len);
+        iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, WRITE | ITER_KVEC, iov, 1, len);
         msg.msg_control         = NULL;
         msg.msg_controllen      = 0;
         msg.msg_flags           = 0;