aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorStefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>2010-12-01 09:51:44 -0500
committerStefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>2010-12-02 09:28:22 -0500
commite5fc7345412d5e4758fcef55a74354c5cbefd61e (patch)
tree00f8303544240826fb2dd2b97de5ff66596e7beb /drivers
parente8a7e48bb248a1196484d3f8afa53bded2b24e71 (diff)
xen: use PHYSDEVOP_get_free_pirq to implement find_unbound_pirq
Use the new hypercall PHYSDEVOP_get_free_pirq to ask Xen to allocate a pirq. Remove the unsupported PHYSDEVOP_get_nr_pirqs hypercall to get the amount of pirq available. This fixes find_unbound_pirq that otherwise would return a number starting from nr_irqs that might very well be out of range in Xen. The symptom of this bug is that when you passthrough an MSI capable pci device to a PV on HVM guest, Linux would fail to enable MSIs on the device. Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers')
-rw-r--r--drivers/xen/events.c45
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 25 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/xen/events.c b/drivers/xen/events.c
index 2811bb988ea0..7ab43c33f746 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/events.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/events.c
@@ -105,7 +105,6 @@ struct irq_info
105 105
106static struct irq_info *irq_info; 106static struct irq_info *irq_info;
107static int *pirq_to_irq; 107static int *pirq_to_irq;
108static int nr_pirqs;
109 108
110static int *evtchn_to_irq; 109static int *evtchn_to_irq;
111struct cpu_evtchn_s { 110struct cpu_evtchn_s {
@@ -385,12 +384,17 @@ static int get_nr_hw_irqs(void)
385 return ret; 384 return ret;
386} 385}
387 386
388/* callers of this function should make sure that PHYSDEVOP_get_nr_pirqs 387static int find_unbound_pirq(int type)
389 * succeeded otherwise nr_pirqs won't hold the right value */
390static int find_unbound_pirq(void)
391{ 388{
392 int i; 389 int rc, i;
393 for (i = nr_pirqs-1; i >= 0; i--) { 390 struct physdev_get_free_pirq op_get_free_pirq;
391 op_get_free_pirq.type = type;
392
393 rc = HYPERVISOR_physdev_op(PHYSDEVOP_get_free_pirq, &op_get_free_pirq);
394 if (!rc)
395 return op_get_free_pirq.pirq;
396
397 for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
394 if (pirq_to_irq[i] < 0) 398 if (pirq_to_irq[i] < 0)
395 return i; 399 return i;
396 } 400 }
@@ -611,10 +615,10 @@ int xen_map_pirq_gsi(unsigned pirq, unsigned gsi, int shareable, char *name)
611 615
612 spin_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock); 616 spin_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
613 617
614 if ((pirq > nr_pirqs) || (gsi > nr_irqs)) { 618 if ((pirq > nr_irqs) || (gsi > nr_irqs)) {
615 printk(KERN_WARNING "xen_map_pirq_gsi: %s %s is incorrect!\n", 619 printk(KERN_WARNING "xen_map_pirq_gsi: %s %s is incorrect!\n",
616 pirq > nr_pirqs ? "nr_pirqs" :"", 620 pirq > nr_irqs ? "pirq" :"",
617 gsi > nr_irqs ? "nr_irqs" : ""); 621 gsi > nr_irqs ? "gsi" : "");
618 goto out; 622 goto out;
619 } 623 }
620 624
@@ -672,7 +676,7 @@ void xen_allocate_pirq_msi(char *name, int *irq, int *pirq)
672 if (*irq == -1) 676 if (*irq == -1)
673 goto out; 677 goto out;
674 678
675 *pirq = find_unbound_pirq(); 679 *pirq = find_unbound_pirq(MAP_PIRQ_TYPE_MSI);
676 if (*pirq == -1) 680 if (*pirq == -1)
677 goto out; 681 goto out;
678 682
@@ -1506,26 +1510,17 @@ void xen_callback_vector(void) {}
1506 1510
1507void __init xen_init_IRQ(void) 1511void __init xen_init_IRQ(void)
1508{ 1512{
1509 int i, rc; 1513 int i;
1510 struct physdev_nr_pirqs op_nr_pirqs;
1511 1514
1512 cpu_evtchn_mask_p = kcalloc(nr_cpu_ids, sizeof(struct cpu_evtchn_s), 1515 cpu_evtchn_mask_p = kcalloc(nr_cpu_ids, sizeof(struct cpu_evtchn_s),
1513 GFP_KERNEL); 1516 GFP_KERNEL);
1514 irq_info = kcalloc(nr_irqs, sizeof(*irq_info), GFP_KERNEL); 1517 irq_info = kcalloc(nr_irqs, sizeof(*irq_info), GFP_KERNEL);
1515 1518
1516 rc = HYPERVISOR_physdev_op(PHYSDEVOP_get_nr_pirqs, &op_nr_pirqs); 1519 /* We are using nr_irqs as the maximum number of pirq available but
1517 if (rc < 0) { 1520 * that number is actually chosen by Xen and we don't know exactly
1518 nr_pirqs = nr_irqs; 1521 * what it is. Be careful choosing high pirq numbers. */
1519 if (rc != -ENOSYS) 1522 pirq_to_irq = kcalloc(nr_irqs, sizeof(*pirq_to_irq), GFP_KERNEL);
1520 printk(KERN_WARNING "PHYSDEVOP_get_nr_pirqs returned rc=%d\n", rc); 1523 for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++)
1521 } else {
1522 if (xen_pv_domain() && !xen_initial_domain())
1523 nr_pirqs = max((int)op_nr_pirqs.nr_pirqs, nr_irqs);
1524 else
1525 nr_pirqs = op_nr_pirqs.nr_pirqs;
1526 }
1527 pirq_to_irq = kcalloc(nr_pirqs, sizeof(*pirq_to_irq), GFP_KERNEL);
1528 for (i = 0; i < nr_pirqs; i++)
1529 pirq_to_irq[i] = -1; 1524 pirq_to_irq[i] = -1;
1530 1525
1531 evtchn_to_irq = kcalloc(NR_EVENT_CHANNELS, sizeof(*evtchn_to_irq), 1526 evtchn_to_irq = kcalloc(NR_EVENT_CHANNELS, sizeof(*evtchn_to_irq),