Revert "usb: pl2303: add two comments concerning the supported baud rates with HX chips"

This reverts commit c23bda365dfbf56aa4d6d4a97f83136c36050e01.

Revert all of the pl2303 changes that went into 3.12-rc1 and -rc2 as
they cause regressions on some versions of the chip.  This will all be
revisited for later kernel versions when we can figure out how to handle
this in a way that does not break working devices.

Reported-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Frank Schäfer <fschaefer.oss@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: Johan Hovold <jhovold@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 12 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/pl2303.c b/drivers/usb/serial/pl2303.c
index 6638c5d9079d..09fb55cf3be7 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/serial/pl2303.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/serial/pl2303.c
@@ -281,12 +281,6 @@ static int pl2303_baudrate_encode_direct(int baud, enum pl2303_type type,
                                  4800, 7200, 9600, 14400, 19200, 28800, 38400,
                                  57600, 115200, 230400, 460800, 614400, 921600,
                                  1228800, 2457600, 3000000, 6000000 };
-        /*
-         * NOTE: The PL2303HX (tested with rev. 3A) also supports the following
-         * baud rates: 128000, 134400, 161280, 201600, 268800, 403200, 806400.
-         * As long as we are not using this encoding method for them, there is
-         * no point in complicating the code to support them.
-         */
         int i;
 
         /* Set baudrate to nearest supported value */
@@ -400,12 +394,6 @@ static void pl2303_encode_baudrate(struct tty_struct *tty,
          *    => supported by all chip types
          * 2) Divisor based method: encodes a divisor to a base value (12MHz*32)
          *    => supported by HX chips (and likely not by type_0/1 chips)
-         *
-         * NOTE: Although the divisor based baud rate encoding method is much
-         * more flexible, some of the standard baud rate values can not be
-         * realized exactly. But the difference is very small (max. 0.2%) and
-         * the device likely uses the same baud rate generator for both methods
-         * so that there is likley no difference.
          */
         if (type != HX)
                 baud = pl2303_baudrate_encode_direct(baud, type, buf);