time, drivers/rtc: Don't bother with rtc_resume() for the nonstop clocksource

If a system does not provide a persistent_clock(), the time
will be updated on resume by rtc_resume(). With the addition
of the non-stop clocksources for suspend timing, those systems
set the time on resume in timekeeping_resume(), but may not
provide a valid persistent_clock().

This results in the rtc_resume() logic thinking no one has set
the time and it then will over-write the suspend time again,
which is not necessary and only increases clock error.

So, fix this for rtc_resume().

This patch also improves the name of persistent_clock_exist to
make it more grammatical.

Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427945681-29972-19-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/class.c b/drivers/rtc/class.c
index d40760aa4553..c29ba7e14304 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/class.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/class.c
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static int rtc_suspend(struct device *dev)
         struct timespec64       delta, delta_delta;
         int err;
 
-        if (has_persistent_clock())
+        if (timekeeping_rtc_skipsuspend())
                 return 0;
 
         if (strcmp(dev_name(&rtc->dev), CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE) != 0)
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static int rtc_resume(struct device *dev)
         struct timespec64       sleep_time;
         int err;
 
-        if (has_persistent_clock())
+        if (timekeeping_rtc_skipresume())
                 return 0;
 
         rtc_hctosys_ret = -ENODEV;