pcmcia: Use list_for_each_entry() for bus traversal

Replace list_for_each() + pci_bus_b() with list_for_each_entry().

[bhelgaas: fix "silbling" typo]
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/yenta_socket.c b/drivers/pcmcia/yenta_socket.c
index 8485761e76af..946f90ef6020 100644
--- a/drivers/pcmcia/yenta_socket.c
+++ b/drivers/pcmcia/yenta_socket.c
@@ -1076,7 +1076,7 @@ static void yenta_config_init(struct yenta_socket *socket)
  */
 static void yenta_fixup_parent_bridge(struct pci_bus *cardbus_bridge)
 {
-        struct list_head *tmp;
+        struct pci_bus *sibling;
         unsigned char upper_limit;
         /*
          * We only check and fix the parent bridge: All systems which need
@@ -1095,18 +1095,18 @@ static void yenta_fixup_parent_bridge(struct pci_bus *cardbus_bridge)
         /* stay within the limits of the bus range of the parent: */
         upper_limit = bridge_to_fix->parent->busn_res.end;
 
-        /* check the bus ranges of all silbling bridges to prevent overlap */
-        list_for_each(tmp, &bridge_to_fix->parent->children) {
-                struct pci_bus *silbling = pci_bus_b(tmp);
+        /* check the bus ranges of all sibling bridges to prevent overlap */
+        list_for_each_entry(sibling, &bridge_to_fix->parent->children,
+                        node) {
                 /*
-                 * If the silbling has a higher secondary bus number
+                 * If the sibling has a higher secondary bus number
                  * and it's secondary is equal or smaller than our
                  * current upper limit, set the new upper limit to
-                 * the bus number below the silbling's range:
+                 * the bus number below the sibling's range:
                  */
-                if (silbling->busn_res.start > bridge_to_fix->busn_res.end
-                    && silbling->busn_res.start <= upper_limit)
-                        upper_limit = silbling->busn_res.start - 1;
+                if (sibling->busn_res.start > bridge_to_fix->busn_res.end
+                    && sibling->busn_res.start <= upper_limit)
+                        upper_limit = sibling->busn_res.start - 1;
         }
 
         /* Show that the wanted subordinate number is not possible: */