Merge branch 'mpi-master' into wip-k-fmlpwip-k-fmlp

Conflicts:
	litmus/sched_cedf.c

1 files changed, 11 insertions, 15 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/diskonchip.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/diskonchip.c
index b7f8de7b2780..7837728d02ff 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/diskonchip.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/diskonchip.c
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static struct rs_control *rs_decoder;
  *
  * Fabrice Bellard figured this out in the old docecc code. I added
  * some comments, improved a minor bit and converted it to make use
- * of the generic Reed-Solomon libary. tglx
+ * of the generic Reed-Solomon library. tglx
  */
 static int doc_ecc_decode(struct rs_control *rs, uint8_t *data, uint8_t *ecc)
 {
@@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ static uint16_t __init doc200x_ident_chip(struct mtd_info *mtd, int nr)
         doc200x_hwcontrol(mtd, 0, NAND_CTRL_ALE | NAND_CTRL_CHANGE);
         doc200x_hwcontrol(mtd, NAND_CMD_NONE, NAND_NCE | NAND_CTRL_CHANGE);
 
-        /* We cant' use dev_ready here, but at least we wait for the
+        /* We can't use dev_ready here, but at least we wait for the
          * command to complete
          */
         udelay(50);
@@ -986,7 +986,7 @@ static int doc200x_correct_data(struct mtd_info *mtd, u_char *dat,
                 dummy = ReadDOC(docptr, ECCConf);
         }
 
-        /* Error occured ? */
+        /* Error occurred ? */
         if (dummy & 0x80) {
                 for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
                         if (DoC_is_MillenniumPlus(doc))
@@ -1160,7 +1160,7 @@ static inline int __init nftl_partscan(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct mtd_partitio
         /* NOTE: The lines below modify internal variables of the NAND and MTD
            layers; variables with have already been configured by nand_scan.
            Unfortunately, we didn't know before this point what these values
-           should be.  Thus, this code is somewhat dependant on the exact
+           should be.  Thus, this code is somewhat dependent on the exact
            implementation of the NAND layer.  */
         if (mh->UnitSizeFactor != 0xff) {
                 this->bbt_erase_shift += (0xff - mh->UnitSizeFactor);
@@ -1360,11 +1360,9 @@ static int __init nftl_scan_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd)
            At least as nand_bbt.c is currently written. */
         if ((ret = nand_scan_bbt(mtd, NULL)))
                 return ret;
-        add_mtd_device(mtd);
-#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS
+        mtd_device_register(mtd, NULL, 0);
         if (!no_autopart)
-                add_mtd_partitions(mtd, parts, numparts);
-#endif
+                mtd_device_register(mtd, parts, numparts);
         return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1419,11 +1417,9 @@ static int __init inftl_scan_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd)
            autopartitioning, but I want to give it more thought. */
         if (!numparts)
                 return -EIO;
-        add_mtd_device(mtd);
-#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS
+        mtd_device_register(mtd, NULL, 0);
         if (!no_autopart)
-                add_mtd_partitions(mtd, parts, numparts);
-#endif
+                mtd_device_register(mtd, parts, numparts);
         return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1678,9 +1674,9 @@ static int __init doc_probe(unsigned long physadr)
                 /* DBB note: i believe nand_release is necessary here, as
                    buffers may have been allocated in nand_base.  Check with
                    Thomas. FIX ME! */
-                /* nand_release will call del_mtd_device, but we haven't yet
-                   added it.  This is handled without incident by
-                   del_mtd_device, as far as I can tell. */
+                /* nand_release will call mtd_device_unregister, but we
+                   haven't yet added it.  This is handled without incident by
+                   mtd_device_unregister, as far as I can tell. */
                 nand_release(mtd);
                 kfree(mtd);
                 goto fail;