RDMA/addr: Use time_after_eq() instead of time_after() in queue_req()

In queue_req(), use time_after_eq() instead of time_after()
for following reasons :

- Improves insert time if multiple entries with same time are
  present.
- set_timeout need not be called if entry with same time
  is added to the list (and that happens to be the entry
  with the smallest time), saving atomic/locking operations.
- Earlier entries with same time are deleted first (fifo).

Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
index e11187ecc931..a68d7c7df4ca 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static void queue_req(struct addr_req *req)
 
         mutex_lock(&lock);
         list_for_each_entry_reverse(temp_req, &req_list, list) {
-                if (time_after(req->timeout, temp_req->timeout))
+                if (time_after_eq(req->timeout, temp_req->timeout))
                         break;
         }