drm/i915: Remove obsolete seqno parameter from 'i915_add_request'

There is no longer any need to retrieve a seqno value from an i915_add_request()
call. The calling code already knows which request structure is being processed
(it can only be ring->OLR). And as the request itself is now used in preference
to the basic seqno value, the latter is now redundant in this situation.

For: VIZ-4377
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Daniel <Thomas.Daniel@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 69a0e00039c6..d4e1fa757a34 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -2621,10 +2621,9 @@ int __must_check i915_gpu_idle(struct drm_device *dev);
 int __must_check i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_device *dev);
 int __i915_add_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
                        struct drm_file *file,
-                       struct drm_i915_gem_object *batch_obj,
-                       u32 *seqno);
-#define i915_add_request(ring, seqno) \
-        __i915_add_request(ring, NULL, NULL, seqno)
+                       struct drm_i915_gem_object *batch_obj);
+#define i915_add_request(ring) \
+        __i915_add_request(ring, NULL, NULL)
 int __i915_wait_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
                         unsigned reset_counter,
                         bool interruptible,