aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>2011-03-02 05:22:14 -0500
committerTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>2011-03-02 10:34:09 -0500
commitce0033307f1b45e23e0c149f56ea4855eb4687ce (patch)
treea6e87fd74269aafacf62805252de181b9d499579 /arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c
parentcc28989437de5617875a2943697fe6ba51a0da8f (diff)
x86-64, NUMA: Fix distance table handling
NUMA distance table handling has the following problems. * numa_reset_distance() uses numa_distance * sizeof(numa_distance[0]) as the table size when it should be using the square of numa_distance. * The same size miscalculation when allocation space for phys_dist in numa_emulation(). * In numa_emulation(), phys_dist must be reserved; otherwise, the new emulated distance table may overlap it. Fix them and, while at it, take numa_distance_cnt resetting in numa_reset_distance() out of the if block to simplify the code a bit. David Rientjes reported incorrect handling of distance table during emulation. -tj: Edited out numa_alloc_distance() related changes which weren't necessary and rewrote patch description. -v2: Ingo was unhappy with 80-column limit induced linebreaks. Let lines run over 80-column. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c14
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c
index 607a2e8bc87a..0afa25d967ba 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c
@@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ void __init numa_emulation(struct numa_meminfo *numa_meminfo, int numa_dist_cnt)
300 static struct numa_meminfo pi __initdata; 300 static struct numa_meminfo pi __initdata;
301 const u64 max_addr = max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT; 301 const u64 max_addr = max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
302 u8 *phys_dist = NULL; 302 u8 *phys_dist = NULL;
303 size_t phys_size = numa_dist_cnt * numa_dist_cnt * sizeof(phys_dist[0]);
303 int i, j, ret; 304 int i, j, ret;
304 305
305 if (!emu_cmdline) 306 if (!emu_cmdline)
@@ -336,21 +337,18 @@ void __init numa_emulation(struct numa_meminfo *numa_meminfo, int numa_dist_cnt)
336 goto no_emu; 337 goto no_emu;
337 } 338 }
338 339
339 /* 340 /* copy the physical distance table */
340 * Copy the original distance table. It's temporary so no need to
341 * reserve it.
342 */
343 if (numa_dist_cnt) { 341 if (numa_dist_cnt) {
344 size_t size = numa_dist_cnt * sizeof(phys_dist[0]);
345 u64 phys; 342 u64 phys;
346 343
347 phys = memblock_find_in_range(0, 344 phys = memblock_find_in_range(0,
348 (u64)max_pfn_mapped << PAGE_SHIFT, 345 (u64)max_pfn_mapped << PAGE_SHIFT,
349 size, PAGE_SIZE); 346 phys_size, PAGE_SIZE);
350 if (phys == MEMBLOCK_ERROR) { 347 if (phys == MEMBLOCK_ERROR) {
351 pr_warning("NUMA: Warning: can't allocate copy of distance table, disabling emulation\n"); 348 pr_warning("NUMA: Warning: can't allocate copy of distance table, disabling emulation\n");
352 goto no_emu; 349 goto no_emu;
353 } 350 }
351 memblock_x86_reserve_range(phys, phys + phys_size, "TMP NUMA DIST");
354 phys_dist = __va(phys); 352 phys_dist = __va(phys);
355 353
356 for (i = 0; i < numa_dist_cnt; i++) 354 for (i = 0; i < numa_dist_cnt; i++)
@@ -398,6 +396,10 @@ void __init numa_emulation(struct numa_meminfo *numa_meminfo, int numa_dist_cnt)
398 numa_set_distance(i, j, dist); 396 numa_set_distance(i, j, dist);
399 } 397 }
400 } 398 }
399
400 /* free the copied physical distance table */
401 if (phys_dist)
402 memblock_x86_free_range(__pa(phys_dist), __pa(phys_dist) + phys_size);
401 return; 403 return;
402 404
403no_emu: 405no_emu: