aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2008-07-18 10:30:05 -0400
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2008-07-18 10:30:05 -0400
commit3f9b5cc018566ad9562df0648395649aebdbc5e0 (patch)
tree1740bea3780324ca3d72b4e1a513ac8a34d55948 /arch/x86/Kconfig.debug
parent7dedcee394a3f61475d08002bd12e8068d044216 (diff)
x86: re-enable OPTIMIZE_INLINING
re-enable OPTIMIZE_INLINING more widely. Jeff Dike fixed the remaining outstanding issue in this commit: | commit 4f81c5350b44bcc501ab6f8a089b16d064b4d2f6 | Author: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> | Date: Mon Jul 7 13:36:56 2008 -0400 | | [UML] fix gcc ICEs and unresolved externs [...] | This patch reintroduces unit-at-a-time for gcc >= 4.0, bringing back the | possibility of Uli's crash. If that happens, we'll debug it. it's still default-off and thus opt-in. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/Kconfig.debug')
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/Kconfig.debug3
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug b/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug
index ae36bfa814e5..ffd5913b35d1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug
@@ -287,7 +287,6 @@ config CPA_DEBUG
287 287
288config OPTIMIZE_INLINING 288config OPTIMIZE_INLINING
289 bool "Allow gcc to uninline functions marked 'inline'" 289 bool "Allow gcc to uninline functions marked 'inline'"
290 depends on BROKEN
291 help 290 help
292 This option determines if the kernel forces gcc to inline the functions 291 This option determines if the kernel forces gcc to inline the functions
293 developers have marked 'inline'. Doing so takes away freedom from gcc to 292 developers have marked 'inline'. Doing so takes away freedom from gcc to
@@ -298,5 +297,7 @@ config OPTIMIZE_INLINING
298 become the default in the future, until then this option is there to 297 become the default in the future, until then this option is there to
299 test gcc for this. 298 test gcc for this.
300 299
300 If unsure, say N.
301
301endmenu 302endmenu
302 303