uml: stop gdb from deleting breakpoints when running UML

Sometimes when UML is debugged gdb miss breakpoints.

When process traced by gdb do fork, debugger remove breakpoints from
child address space. There is possibility to trace more than one fork,
but this not work with UML, I guess (only guess) there is a deadlock -
gdb waits for UML and UML waits for gdb.

When clone() is called with SIGCHLD and CLONE_VM flags, gdb see this
as PTRACE_EVENT_FORK not as PTRACE_EVENT_CLONE and remove breakpoints
from child and at the same time from traced process, because either
have the same address space.

Maybe it is possible to do fix in gdb, but I'm not sure if there is
easy way to find out if traced and child processes share memory. So I
do fix for UML, it simply do not call clone() with both SIGCHLD and
CLONE_VM flags together.  Additionally __WALL flag is used for
waitpid() to assure not miss clone and normal process events.

[ jdike - checkpatch fixes ]

Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@wp.pl>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/arch/um/os-Linux/process.c b/arch/um/os-Linux/process.c
index 37781db4ceca..bda5c3150d6c 100644
--- a/arch/um/os-Linux/process.c
+++ b/arch/um/os-Linux/process.c
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ void os_kill_process(int pid, int reap_child)
 {
         kill(pid, SIGKILL);
         if (reap_child)
-                CATCH_EINTR(waitpid(pid, NULL, 0));
+                CATCH_EINTR(waitpid(pid, NULL, __WALL));
 }
 
 /* This is here uniquely to have access to the userspace errno, i.e. the one
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ void os_kill_ptraced_process(int pid, int reap_child)
         ptrace(PTRACE_KILL, pid);
         ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, pid);
         if (reap_child)
-                CATCH_EINTR(waitpid(pid, NULL, 0));
+                CATCH_EINTR(waitpid(pid, NULL, __WALL));
 }
 
 /* Don't use the glibc version, which caches the result in TLS. It misses some