[CPUFREQ] correct powernow-k8 fid/vid masks for extended parts

The fid/vid masks for parts using the extended parts are slightly incorrect and can result in
incorrect fid/vid codes being applied.  No instances of this problem have been reported in
the field but it could be a problem with future parts.

Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c b/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
index d8be4b01488d..756d0a333ed6 100644
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
@@ -885,8 +885,8 @@ static int fill_powernow_table_fidvid(struct powernow_k8_data *data, struct cpuf
                 u32 vid;
 
                 if (data->exttype) {
-                        fid = data->acpi_data.states[i].status & FID_MASK;
-                        vid = (data->acpi_data.states[i].status >> VID_SHIFT) & VID_MASK;
+                        fid = data->acpi_data.states[i].status & EXT_FID_MASK;
+                        vid = (data->acpi_data.states[i].status >> VID_SHIFT) & EXT_VID_MASK;
                 } else {
                         fid = data->acpi_data.states[i].control & FID_MASK;
                         vid = (data->acpi_data.states[i].control >> VID_SHIFT) & VID_MASK;