aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>2013-06-19 14:53:51 -0400
committerPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>2013-07-14 19:36:59 -0400
commit0db0628d90125193280eabb501c94feaf48fa9ab (patch)
tree0e0ef0c4eac101d25a3bd125c4a9200ac4d294c0 /Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt
parent49fb4c6290c70c418a5c25eee996d6b55ea132d6 (diff)
kernel: delete __cpuinit usage from all core kernel files
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. This removes all the uses of the __cpuinit macros from C files in the core kernel directories (kernel, init, lib, mm, and include) that don't really have a specific maintainer. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt6
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt b/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt
index edd4b4df3932..786dc82f98ce 100644
--- a/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt
+++ b/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt
@@ -267,8 +267,8 @@ Q: If i have some kernel code that needs to be aware of CPU arrival and
267A: This is what you would need in your kernel code to receive notifications. 267A: This is what you would need in your kernel code to receive notifications.
268 268
269 #include <linux/cpu.h> 269 #include <linux/cpu.h>
270 static int __cpuinit foobar_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb, 270 static int foobar_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
271 unsigned long action, void *hcpu) 271 unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
272 { 272 {
273 unsigned int cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu; 273 unsigned int cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu;
274 274
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ A: This is what you would need in your kernel code to receive notifications.
285 return NOTIFY_OK; 285 return NOTIFY_OK;
286 } 286 }
287 287
288 static struct notifier_block __cpuinitdata foobar_cpu_notifer = 288 static struct notifier_block foobar_cpu_notifer =
289 { 289 {
290 .notifier_call = foobar_cpu_callback, 290 .notifier_call = foobar_cpu_callback,
291 }; 291 };