aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>2011-06-15 18:08:46 -0400
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2011-06-15 23:04:01 -0400
commitfbc29a25e484be073e7d762c9f7f1d4bf8aecc48 (patch)
tree276a9e1e0c3d8f653dd821c049ec4b6940a06c1d
parent26fe616844491a41a1abc02e29f7a9d1ec2f8ddb (diff)
memcg: avoid percpu cached charge draining at softlimit
Based on Michal Hocko's comment. We are not draining per cpu cached charges during soft limit reclaim because background reclaim doesn't care about charges. It tries to free some memory and charges will not give any. Cached charges might influence only selection of the biggest soft limit offender but as the call is done only after the selection has been already done it makes no change. Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r--mm/memcontrol.c8
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index c39a177bb641..cf7d027a8844 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1670,7 +1670,13 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem,
1670 victim = mem_cgroup_select_victim(root_mem); 1670 victim = mem_cgroup_select_victim(root_mem);
1671 if (victim == root_mem) { 1671 if (victim == root_mem) {
1672 loop++; 1672 loop++;
1673 if (loop >= 1) 1673 /*
1674 * We are not draining per cpu cached charges during
1675 * soft limit reclaim because global reclaim doesn't
1676 * care about charges. It tries to free some memory and
1677 * charges will not give any.
1678 */
1679 if (!check_soft && loop >= 1)
1674 drain_all_stock_async(root_mem); 1680 drain_all_stock_async(root_mem);
1675 if (loop >= 2) { 1681 if (loop >= 2) {
1676 /* 1682 /*