mm: vmscan: obey proportional scanning requirements for kswapd

Simplistically, the anon and file LRU lists are scanned proportionally
depending on the value of vm.swappiness although there are other factors
taken into account by get_scan_count().  The patch "mm: vmscan: Limit
the number of pages kswapd reclaims" limits the number of pages kswapd
reclaims but it breaks this proportional scanning and may evenly shrink
anon/file LRUs regardless of vm.swappiness.

This patch preserves the proportional scanning and reclaim.  It does
mean that kswapd will reclaim more than requested but the number of
pages will be related to the high watermark.

[mhocko@suse.cz: Correct proportional reclaim for memcg and simplify]
[kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com: Recalculate scan based on target]
[hannes@cmpxchg.org: Account for already scanned pages properly]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Tested-by: Zlatko Calusic <zcalusic@bitsync.net>
Cc: dormando <dormando@rydia.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 59 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index cdbc0699ea21..26ad67f1962c 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1822,17 +1822,25 @@ out:
 static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
 {
         unsigned long nr[NR_LRU_LISTS];
+        unsigned long targets[NR_LRU_LISTS];
         unsigned long nr_to_scan;
         enum lru_list lru;
         unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
         unsigned long nr_to_reclaim = sc->nr_to_reclaim;
         struct blk_plug plug;
+        bool scan_adjusted = false;
 
         get_scan_count(lruvec, sc, nr);
 
+        /* Record the original scan target for proportional adjustments later */
+        memcpy(targets, nr, sizeof(nr));
+
         blk_start_plug(&plug);
         while (nr[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON] || nr[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] ||
                                         nr[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE]) {
+                unsigned long nr_anon, nr_file, percentage;
+                unsigned long nr_scanned;
+
                 for_each_evictable_lru(lru) {
                         if (nr[lru]) {
                                 nr_to_scan = min(nr[lru], SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX);
@@ -1842,17 +1850,60 @@ static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
                                                             lruvec, sc);
                         }
                 }
+
+                if (nr_reclaimed < nr_to_reclaim || scan_adjusted)
+                        continue;
+
                 /*
-                 * On large memory systems, scan >> priority can become
-                 * really large. This is fine for the starting priority;
-                 * we want to put equal scanning pressure on each zone.
-                 * However, if the VM has a harder time of freeing pages,
-                 * with multiple processes reclaiming pages, the total
-                 * freeing target can get unreasonably large.
+                 * For global direct reclaim, reclaim only the number of pages
+                 * requested. Less care is taken to scan proportionally as it
+                 * is more important to minimise direct reclaim stall latency
+                 * than it is to properly age the LRU lists.
                  */
-                if (nr_reclaimed >= nr_to_reclaim &&
-                    sc->priority < DEF_PRIORITY)
+                if (global_reclaim(sc) && !current_is_kswapd())
                         break;
+
+                /*
+                 * For kswapd and memcg, reclaim at least the number of pages
+                 * requested. Ensure that the anon and file LRUs shrink
+                 * proportionally what was requested by get_scan_count(). We
+                 * stop reclaiming one LRU and reduce the amount scanning
+                 * proportional to the original scan target.
+                 */
+                nr_file = nr[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE] + nr[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE];
+                nr_anon = nr[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON] + nr[LRU_ACTIVE_ANON];
+
+                if (nr_file > nr_anon) {
+                        unsigned long scan_target = targets[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON] +
+                                                targets[LRU_ACTIVE_ANON] + 1;
+                        lru = LRU_BASE;
+                        percentage = nr_anon * 100 / scan_target;
+                } else {
+                        unsigned long scan_target = targets[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE] +
+                                                targets[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] + 1;
+                        lru = LRU_FILE;
+                        percentage = nr_file * 100 / scan_target;
+                }
+
+                /* Stop scanning the smaller of the LRU */
+                nr[lru] = 0;
+                nr[lru + LRU_ACTIVE] = 0;
+
+                /*
+                 * Recalculate the other LRU scan count based on its original
+                 * scan target and the percentage scanning already complete
+                 */
+                lru = (lru == LRU_FILE) ? LRU_BASE : LRU_FILE;
+                nr_scanned = targets[lru] - nr[lru];
+                nr[lru] = targets[lru] * (100 - percentage) / 100;
+                nr[lru] -= min(nr[lru], nr_scanned);
+
+                lru += LRU_ACTIVE;
+                nr_scanned = targets[lru] - nr[lru];
+                nr[lru] = targets[lru] * (100 - percentage) / 100;
+                nr[lru] -= min(nr[lru], nr_scanned);
+
+                scan_adjusted = true;
         }
         blk_finish_plug(&plug);
         sc->nr_reclaimed += nr_reclaimed;