aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>2015-05-27 19:39:53 -0400
committerRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>2015-05-27 19:39:53 -0400
commitdc4fdaf0e4839109169d8261814813816951c75f (patch)
treee6eaba2f03f568e051b0be16211f7160db0eaaea
parentba155e2d21f6bf05de86a78dbe5bfd8757604a65 (diff)
PCI / ACPI: Do not set ACPI companions for host bridges with parents
Commit 97badf873ab6 (device property: Make it possible to use secondary firmware nodes) uncovered a bug in the x86 (and ia64) PCI host bridge initialization code that assumes bridge->bus->sysdata to always point to a struct pci_sysdata object which need not be the case (in particular, the Xen PCI frontend driver sets it to point to a different data type). If it is not the case, an incorrect pointer (or a piece of data that is not a pointer at all) will be passed to ACPI_COMPANION_SET() and that may cause interesting breakage to happen going forward. To work around this problem use the observation that the ACPI host bridge initialization always passes NULL as parent to pci_create_root_bus(), so if pcibios_root_bridge_prepare() sees a non-NULL parent of the bridge, it should not attempt to set an ACPI companion for it, because that means that pci_create_root_bus() has been called by someone else. Fixes: 97badf873ab6 (device property: Make it possible to use secondary firmware nodes) Reported-and-tested-by: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-rw-r--r--arch/ia64/pci/pci.c13
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/pci/acpi.c13
2 files changed, 20 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c b/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
index d4e162d35b34..7cc3be9fa7c6 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
@@ -478,9 +478,16 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
478 478
479int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge) 479int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
480{ 480{
481 struct pci_controller *controller = bridge->bus->sysdata; 481 /*
482 482 * We pass NULL as parent to pci_create_root_bus(), so if it is not NULL
483 ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&bridge->dev, controller->companion); 483 * here, pci_create_root_bus() has been called by someone else and
484 * sysdata is likely to be different from what we expect. Let it go in
485 * that case.
486 */
487 if (!bridge->dev.parent) {
488 struct pci_controller *controller = bridge->bus->sysdata;
489 ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&bridge->dev, controller->companion);
490 }
484 return 0; 491 return 0;
485} 492}
486 493
diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
index d93963340c3c..14a63ed6fe09 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
@@ -482,9 +482,16 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
482 482
483int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge) 483int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
484{ 484{
485 struct pci_sysdata *sd = bridge->bus->sysdata; 485 /*
486 486 * We pass NULL as parent to pci_create_root_bus(), so if it is not NULL
487 ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&bridge->dev, sd->companion); 487 * here, pci_create_root_bus() has been called by someone else and
488 * sysdata is likely to be different from what we expect. Let it go in
489 * that case.
490 */
491 if (!bridge->dev.parent) {
492 struct pci_sysdata *sd = bridge->bus->sysdata;
493 ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&bridge->dev, sd->companion);
494 }
488 return 0; 495 return 0;
489} 496}
490 497