aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>2015-02-12 18:00:36 -0500
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2015-02-12 21:54:11 -0500
commitba6b17d68c8e3aa8d55d0474299cb931965c5ea5 (patch)
tree3130712f638e8158e7b5f985cec46189564fc935
parent1fec117281d9f5349c35279c9521f4096fa33357 (diff)
zram: fix umount-reset_store-mount race condition
Ganesh Mahendran was the first one who proposed to use bdev->bd_mutex to avoid ->bd_holders race condition: CPU0 CPU1 umount /* zram->init_done is true */ reset_store() bdev->bd_holders == 0 mount ... zram_make_request() zram_reset_device() However, his solution required some considerable amount of code movement, which we can avoid. Apart from using bdev->bd_mutex in reset_store(), this patch also simplifies zram_reset_device(). zram_reset_device() has a bool parameter reset_capacity which tells it whether disk capacity and itself disk should be reset. There are two zram_reset_device() callers: -- zram_exit() passes reset_capacity=false -- reset_store() passes reset_capacity=true So we can move reset_capacity-sensitive work out of zram_reset_device() and perform it unconditionally in reset_store(). This also lets us drop reset_capacity parameter from zram_reset_device() and pass zram pointer only. Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Reported-by: Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@gmail.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r--drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c23
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
index 0e07652cf7c1..2607bd9f4955 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static void zram_bio_discard(struct zram *zram, u32 index,
715 } 715 }
716} 716}
717 717
718static void zram_reset_device(struct zram *zram, bool reset_capacity) 718static void zram_reset_device(struct zram *zram)
719{ 719{
720 down_write(&zram->init_lock); 720 down_write(&zram->init_lock);
721 721
@@ -734,18 +734,7 @@ static void zram_reset_device(struct zram *zram, bool reset_capacity)
734 memset(&zram->stats, 0, sizeof(zram->stats)); 734 memset(&zram->stats, 0, sizeof(zram->stats));
735 735
736 zram->disksize = 0; 736 zram->disksize = 0;
737 if (reset_capacity)
738 set_capacity(zram->disk, 0);
739
740 up_write(&zram->init_lock); 737 up_write(&zram->init_lock);
741
742 /*
743 * Revalidate disk out of the init_lock to avoid lockdep splat.
744 * It's okay because disk's capacity is protected by init_lock
745 * so that revalidate_disk always sees up-to-date capacity.
746 */
747 if (reset_capacity)
748 revalidate_disk(zram->disk);
749} 738}
750 739
751static ssize_t disksize_store(struct device *dev, 740static ssize_t disksize_store(struct device *dev,
@@ -818,6 +807,7 @@ static ssize_t reset_store(struct device *dev,
818 if (!bdev) 807 if (!bdev)
819 return -ENOMEM; 808 return -ENOMEM;
820 809
810 mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
821 /* Do not reset an active device! */ 811 /* Do not reset an active device! */
822 if (bdev->bd_holders) { 812 if (bdev->bd_holders) {
823 ret = -EBUSY; 813 ret = -EBUSY;
@@ -835,12 +825,17 @@ static ssize_t reset_store(struct device *dev,
835 825
836 /* Make sure all pending I/O is finished */ 826 /* Make sure all pending I/O is finished */
837 fsync_bdev(bdev); 827 fsync_bdev(bdev);
828 zram_reset_device(zram);
829 set_capacity(zram->disk, 0);
830
831 mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
832 revalidate_disk(zram->disk);
838 bdput(bdev); 833 bdput(bdev);
839 834
840 zram_reset_device(zram, true);
841 return len; 835 return len;
842 836
843out: 837out:
838 mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
844 bdput(bdev); 839 bdput(bdev);
845 return ret; 840 return ret;
846} 841}
@@ -1186,7 +1181,7 @@ static void __exit zram_exit(void)
1186 * Shouldn't access zram->disk after destroy_device 1181 * Shouldn't access zram->disk after destroy_device
1187 * because destroy_device already released zram->disk. 1182 * because destroy_device already released zram->disk.
1188 */ 1183 */
1189 zram_reset_device(zram, false); 1184 zram_reset_device(zram);
1190 } 1185 }
1191 1186
1192 unregister_blkdev(zram_major, "zram"); 1187 unregister_blkdev(zram_major, "zram");