rwsem: no need for explicit signed longs

Change explicit "signed long" declarations into plain "long" as suggested
by Peter Hurley.

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/lib/rwsem.c b/lib/rwsem.c
index 61f91ca75e40..cf0ad2ad19f5 100644
--- a/lib/rwsem.c
+++ b/lib/rwsem.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, enum rwsem_wake_type wake_type)
         struct rwsem_waiter *waiter;
         struct task_struct *tsk;
         struct list_head *next;
-        signed long oldcount, woken, loop, adjustment;
+        long oldcount, woken, loop, adjustment;
 
         waiter = list_entry(sem->wait_list.next, struct rwsem_waiter, list);
         if (waiter->type == RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE) {
@@ -145,10 +145,9 @@ __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, enum rwsem_wake_type wake_type)
  */
 struct rw_semaphore __sched *rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
-        signed long adjustment = -RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS;
+        long count, adjustment = -RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS;
         struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
         struct task_struct *tsk = current;
-        signed long count;
 
         /* set up my own style of waitqueue */
         waiter.task = tsk;
@@ -193,10 +192,9 @@ struct rw_semaphore __sched *rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
  */
 struct rw_semaphore __sched *rwsem_down_write_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
-        signed long adjustment = -RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS;
+        long count, adjustment = -RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS;
         struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
         struct task_struct *tsk = current;
-        signed long count;
 
         /* set up my own style of waitqueue */
         waiter.task = tsk;