x86/oprofile: Fix usage of NUM_CONTROLS/NUM_COUNTERS macros

Use the corresponding macros when iterating over counter and control
registers. Since NUM_CONTROLS and NUM_COUNTERS are equal for AMD cpus
the fix is more a cosmetical change.

Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c
index fdbed3a0c877..dcfd4505cacc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static void op_amd_fill_in_addresses(struct op_msrs * const msrs)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_OPROFILE_EVENT_MULTIPLEX
         for (i = 0; i < NUM_VIRT_COUNTERS; i++) {
-                int hw_counter = i % NUM_CONTROLS;
+                int hw_counter = i % NUM_COUNTERS;
                 if (reserve_perfctr_nmi(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + i))
                         msrs->multiplex[i].addr = MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + hw_counter;
                 else
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ static void op_amd_shutdown(struct op_msrs const * const msrs)
                 if (msrs->counters[i].addr)
                         release_perfctr_nmi(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + i);
         }
-        for (i = 0; i < NUM_COUNTERS; ++i) {
+        for (i = 0; i < NUM_CONTROLS; ++i) {
                 if (msrs->controls[i].addr)
                         release_evntsel_nmi(MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0 + i);
         }