cpufreq: powernow-k6: Fix incorrect comparison with max_multipler

The value of 'max_multiplier' is meant to be used for comparison with
clock_ratio[index].driver_data, not the index itself! Fix the code in
powernow_k6_cpu_exit() that has this bug.

Also, while at it, make the for-loop condition look for CPUFREQ_TABLE_END,
instead of hard-coding the loop count to 8.

Reported-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c
index 49f120e1bc7b..695a68cfdcd4 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c
@@ -227,8 +227,9 @@ have_busfreq:
 static int powernow_k6_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
         unsigned int i;
-        for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
-                if (i == max_multiplier)
+
+        for (i = 0; (clock_ratio[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END); i++) {
+                if (clock_ratio[i].driver_data == max_multiplier)
                         powernow_k6_target(policy, i);
         }
         return 0;