[CPUFREQ] ondemand: add a check to avoid negative load calculation

Due to rounding and inexact jiffy accounting, idle_ticks can sometimes
be higher than total_ticks. Make sure those cases are handled as
zero load case.

Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
index 8532bb79e5fc..dc6f357390e2 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ static struct attribute_group dbs_attr_group = {
 static void dbs_check_cpu(struct cpu_dbs_info_s *this_dbs_info)
 {
         unsigned int idle_ticks, total_ticks;
-        unsigned int load;
+        unsigned int load = 0;
         cputime64_t cur_jiffies;
 
         struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
@@ -370,7 +370,8 @@ static void dbs_check_cpu(struct cpu_dbs_info_s *this_dbs_info)
                 if (tmp_idle_ticks < idle_ticks)
                         idle_ticks = tmp_idle_ticks;
         }
-        load = (100 * (total_ticks - idle_ticks)) / total_ticks;
+        if (likely(total_ticks > idle_ticks))
+                load = (100 * (total_ticks - idle_ticks)) / total_ticks;
 
         /* Check for frequency increase */
         if (load > dbs_tuners_ins.up_threshold) {