Fix execve behavior apparmor for PR_{GET,SET}_NO_NEW_PRIVS

Add support for AppArmor to explicitly fail requested domain transitions
if NO_NEW_PRIVS is set and the task is not unconfined.

Transitions from unconfined are still allowed because this always results
in a reduction of privileges.

Acked-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>

v18: new acked-by, new description
Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>

1 files changed, 35 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/security/apparmor/domain.c b/security/apparmor/domain.c
index 18c88d06e88..b81ea10a17a 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/domain.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/domain.c
@@ -360,10 +360,6 @@ int apparmor_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
         if (bprm->cred_prepared)
                 return 0;
 
-        /* XXX: no_new_privs is not usable with AppArmor yet */
-        if (bprm->unsafe & LSM_UNSAFE_NO_NEW_PRIVS)
-                return -EPERM;
-
         cxt = bprm->cred->security;
         BUG_ON(!cxt);
 
@@ -398,6 +394,11 @@ int apparmor_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
                         new_profile = find_attach(ns, &ns->base.profiles, name);
                 if (!new_profile)
                         goto cleanup;
+                /*
+                 * NOTE: Domain transitions from unconfined are allowed
+                 * even when no_new_privs is set because this aways results
+                 * in a further reduction of permissions.
+                 */
                 goto apply;
         }
 
@@ -459,6 +460,16 @@ int apparmor_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
                 /* fail exec */
                 error = -EACCES;
 
+        /*
+         * Policy has specified a domain transition, if no_new_privs then
+         * fail the exec.
+         */
+        if (bprm->unsafe & LSM_UNSAFE_NO_NEW_PRIVS) {
+                aa_put_profile(new_profile);
+                error = -EPERM;
+                goto cleanup;
+        }
+
         if (!new_profile)
                 goto audit;
 
@@ -613,6 +624,14 @@ int aa_change_hat(const char *hats[], int count, u64 token, bool permtest)
         const char *target = NULL, *info = NULL;
         int error = 0;
 
+        /*
+         * Fail explicitly requested domain transitions if no_new_privs.
+         * There is no exception for unconfined as change_hat is not
+         * available.
+         */
+        if (current->no_new_privs)
+                return -EPERM;
+
         /* released below */
         cred = get_current_cred();
         cxt = cred->security;
@@ -754,6 +773,18 @@ int aa_change_profile(const char *ns_name, const char *hname, bool onexec,
         cxt = cred->security;
         profile = aa_cred_profile(cred);
 
+        /*
+         * Fail explicitly requested domain transitions if no_new_privs
+         * and not unconfined.
+         * Domain transitions from unconfined are allowed even when
+         * no_new_privs is set because this aways results in a reduction
+         * of permissions.
+         */
+        if (current->no_new_privs && !unconfined(profile)) {
+                put_cred(cred);
+                return -EPERM;
+        }
+
         if (ns_name) {
                 /* released below */
                 ns = aa_find_namespace(profile->ns, ns_name);