diff options
author | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> | 2008-08-05 21:46:57 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2008-08-05 21:46:57 -0400 |
commit | ffb208479bd62ab26c29a242faeb1de1c6d5fcdc (patch) | |
tree | a825cbc6d7ec125cab86e32008acf816c7bb2bc8 /net/ax25 | |
parent | ff2a79a5a934fe0dbb136ffad61f79b5c6385614 (diff) |
AX.25: Fix sysctl registration if !CONFIG_AX25_DAMA_SLAVE
Since 49ffcf8f99e8d33ec8afb450956804af518fd788 ("sysctl: update
sysctl_check_table") setting struct ctl_table.procname = NULL does no
longer work as it used to the way the AX.25 code is expecting it to
resulting in the AX.25 sysctl registration code to break if
CONFIG_AX25_DAMA_SLAVE was not set as in some distribution kernels.
Kernel releases from 2.6.24 are affected.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/ax25')
-rw-r--r-- | net/ax25/sysctl_net_ax25.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/net/ax25/sysctl_net_ax25.c b/net/ax25/sysctl_net_ax25.c index f597987b242..f288fc4aef9 100644 --- a/net/ax25/sysctl_net_ax25.c +++ b/net/ax25/sysctl_net_ax25.c | |||
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ static struct ctl_path ax25_path[] = { | |||
36 | { .procname = "ax25", .ctl_name = NET_AX25, }, | 36 | { .procname = "ax25", .ctl_name = NET_AX25, }, |
37 | { } | 37 | { } |
38 | }; | 38 | }; |
39 | |||
39 | static const ctl_table ax25_param_table[] = { | 40 | static const ctl_table ax25_param_table[] = { |
40 | { | 41 | { |
41 | .ctl_name = NET_AX25_IP_DEFAULT_MODE, | 42 | .ctl_name = NET_AX25_IP_DEFAULT_MODE, |
@@ -167,6 +168,7 @@ static const ctl_table ax25_param_table[] = { | |||
167 | .extra1 = &min_proto, | 168 | .extra1 = &min_proto, |
168 | .extra2 = &max_proto | 169 | .extra2 = &max_proto |
169 | }, | 170 | }, |
171 | #ifdef CONFIG_AX25_DAMA_SLAVE | ||
170 | { | 172 | { |
171 | .ctl_name = NET_AX25_DAMA_SLAVE_TIMEOUT, | 173 | .ctl_name = NET_AX25_DAMA_SLAVE_TIMEOUT, |
172 | .procname = "dama_slave_timeout", | 174 | .procname = "dama_slave_timeout", |
@@ -177,6 +179,8 @@ static const ctl_table ax25_param_table[] = { | |||
177 | .extra1 = &min_ds_timeout, | 179 | .extra1 = &min_ds_timeout, |
178 | .extra2 = &max_ds_timeout | 180 | .extra2 = &max_ds_timeout |
179 | }, | 181 | }, |
182 | #endif | ||
183 | |||
180 | { .ctl_name = 0 } /* that's all, folks! */ | 184 | { .ctl_name = 0 } /* that's all, folks! */ |
181 | }; | 185 | }; |
182 | 186 | ||
@@ -210,16 +214,6 @@ void ax25_register_sysctl(void) | |||
210 | ax25_table[n].procname = ax25_dev->dev->name; | 214 | ax25_table[n].procname = ax25_dev->dev->name; |
211 | ax25_table[n].mode = 0555; | 215 | ax25_table[n].mode = 0555; |
212 | 216 | ||
213 | #ifndef CONFIG_AX25_DAMA_SLAVE | ||
214 | /* | ||
215 | * We do not wish to have a representation of this parameter | ||
216 | * in /proc/sys/ when configured *not* to include the | ||
217 | * AX.25 DAMA slave code, do we? | ||
218 | */ | ||
219 | |||
220 | child[AX25_VALUES_DS_TIMEOUT].procname = NULL; | ||
221 | #endif | ||
222 | |||
223 | child[AX25_MAX_VALUES].ctl_name = 0; /* just in case... */ | 217 | child[AX25_MAX_VALUES].ctl_name = 0; /* just in case... */ |
224 | 218 | ||
225 | for (k = 0; k < AX25_MAX_VALUES; k++) | 219 | for (k = 0; k < AX25_MAX_VALUES; k++) |