sched/numa: Don't scale the imbalance

It's far too easy to get ridiculously large imbalance pct when you
scale it like that. Use a fixed 125% for now.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-zsriaft1dv7hhboyrpvqjy6s@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 24922b7ff56..6883d998dc3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6261,11 +6261,6 @@ static int *sched_domains_numa_distance;
 static struct cpumask ***sched_domains_numa_masks;
 static int sched_domains_curr_level;
 
-static inline unsigned long numa_scale(unsigned long x, int level)
-{
-        return x * sched_domains_numa_distance[level] / sched_domains_numa_scale;
-}
-
 static inline int sd_local_flags(int level)
 {
         if (sched_domains_numa_distance[level] > REMOTE_DISTANCE)
@@ -6286,7 +6281,7 @@ sd_numa_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl, int cpu)
                 .min_interval           = sd_weight,
                 .max_interval           = 2*sd_weight,
                 .busy_factor            = 32,
-                .imbalance_pct          = 100 + numa_scale(25, level),
+                .imbalance_pct          = 125,
                 .cache_nice_tries       = 2,
                 .busy_idx               = 3,
                 .idle_idx               = 2,