genirq: Plug race in report_bad_irq()

We cannot walk the action chain unlocked. Even if IRQ_INPROGRESS is
set an action can be removed and we follow a null pointer. It's safe
to take the lock there, because the code which removes the action will
call synchronize_irq() which waits unlocked for IRQ_INPROGRESS going
away.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/irq/spurious.c b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
index 3089d3b9d5f..2fbfda2716e 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
@@ -139,15 +139,13 @@ static void poll_spurious_irqs(unsigned long dummy)
  *
  * (The other 100-of-100,000 interrupts may have been a correctly
  *  functioning device sharing an IRQ with the failing one)
- *
- * Called under desc->lock
  */
-
 static void
 __report_bad_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc,
                  irqreturn_t action_ret)
 {
         struct irqaction *action;
+        unsigned long flags;
 
         if (action_ret != IRQ_HANDLED && action_ret != IRQ_NONE) {
                 printk(KERN_ERR "irq event %d: bogus return value %x\n",
@@ -159,6 +157,13 @@ __report_bad_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc,
         dump_stack();
         printk(KERN_ERR "handlers:\n");
 
+        /*
+         * We need to take desc->lock here. note_interrupt() is called
+         * w/o desc->lock held, but IRQ_PROGRESS set. We might race
+         * with something else removing an action. It's ok to take
+         * desc->lock here. See synchronize_irq().
+         */
+        raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
         action = desc->action;
         while (action) {
                 printk(KERN_ERR "[<%p>]", action->handler);
@@ -167,6 +172,7 @@ __report_bad_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc,
                 printk("\n");
                 action = action->next;
         }
+        raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void