Btrfs: fix to search one more bitmap for cluster setup

Suppose there are two bitmaps [0, 256], [256, 512] and one extent
[100, 120] in the free space cache, and we want to setup a cluster
with offset=100, bytes=50.

In this case, there will be only one bitmap [256, 512] in the temporary
bitmaps list, and then setup_cluster_bitmap() won't search bitmap [0, 256].

The cause is, the list is constructed in setup_cluster_no_bitmap(),
and only bitmaps with bitmap_entry->offset >= offset will be added
into the list, and the very bitmap that convers offset has
bitmap_entry->offset <= offset.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>

1 files changed, 12 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
index 181760f9d2a..8f792f41fea 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
@@ -2453,11 +2453,23 @@ setup_cluster_bitmap(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group,
         struct btrfs_free_space *entry;
         struct rb_node *node;
         int ret = -ENOSPC;
+        u64 bitmap_offset = offset_to_bitmap(ctl, offset);
 
         if (ctl->total_bitmaps == 0)
                 return -ENOSPC;
 
         /*
+         * The bitmap that covers offset won't be in the list unless offset
+         * is just its start offset.
+         */
+        entry = list_first_entry(bitmaps, struct btrfs_free_space, list);
+        if (entry->offset != bitmap_offset) {
+                entry = tree_search_offset(ctl, bitmap_offset, 1, 0);
+                if (entry && list_empty(&entry->list))
+                        list_add(&entry->list, bitmaps);
+        }
+
+        /*
          * First check our cached list of bitmaps and see if there is an entry
          * here that will work.
          */