x86, efi: Do not reserve boot services regions within reserved areas

Commit 916f676f8dc started reserving boot service code since some systems
require you to keep that code around until SetVirtualAddressMap is called.

However, in some cases those areas will overlap with reserved regions.
The proper medium-term fix is to fix the bootloader to prevent the
conflicts from occurring by moving the kernel to a better position,
but the kernel should check for this possibility, and only reserve regions
which can be reserved.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4DF7A005.1050407@gmail.com
Acked-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
index 19ae14ba697..0cd3800f33b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
@@ -4,7 +4,6 @@
 #define ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK
 
 u64 memblock_x86_find_in_range_size(u64 start, u64 *sizep, u64 align);
-void memblock_x86_to_bootmem(u64 start, u64 end);
 
 void memblock_x86_reserve_range(u64 start, u64 end, char *name);
 void memblock_x86_free_range(u64 start, u64 end);
@@ -19,5 +18,6 @@ u64 memblock_x86_hole_size(u64 start, u64 end);
 u64 memblock_x86_find_in_range_node(int nid, u64 start, u64 end, u64 size, u64 align);
 u64 memblock_x86_free_memory_in_range(u64 addr, u64 limit);
 u64 memblock_x86_memory_in_range(u64 addr, u64 limit);
+bool memblock_x86_check_reserved_size(u64 *addrp, u64 *sizep, u64 align);
 
 #endif