aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/ppc64/kernel/xics.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>2005-08-04 15:53:37 -0400
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org>2005-08-04 16:00:55 -0400
commit6d22d85a852b72398a81b8e476977b28b4400f7c (patch)
tree3824c246813b7c326bceedc0b8c3c8ca49c7fd0b /arch/ppc64/kernel/xics.c
parent48f1f5328267f52a34e61b8b0e6fc55a23c1348a (diff)
[PATCH] ppc64: fix for kexec boot issue
The kexec boot is not successful on some power machines since all CPUs are getting removed from global interrupt queue (GIQ) before kexec boot. Some systems always expect at least one CPU in GIQ. Hence, this patch will make sure that only secondary CPUs are removed from GIQ. Signed-off-by: Haren Myneni <hbabu@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/ppc64/kernel/xics.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/ppc64/kernel/xics.c31
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/arch/ppc64/kernel/xics.c b/arch/ppc64/kernel/xics.c
index 677c4450984..d9dc6f28d05 100644
--- a/arch/ppc64/kernel/xics.c
+++ b/arch/ppc64/kernel/xics.c
@@ -647,29 +647,30 @@ static void xics_set_affinity(unsigned int virq, cpumask_t cpumask)
647 } 647 }
648} 648}
649 649
650void xics_teardown_cpu(void) 650void xics_teardown_cpu(int secondary)
651{ 651{
652 int cpu = smp_processor_id(); 652 int cpu = smp_processor_id();
653 int status;
654 653
655 ops->cppr_info(cpu, 0x00); 654 ops->cppr_info(cpu, 0x00);
656 iosync(); 655 iosync();
657 656
658 /* 657 /*
659 * we need to EOI the IPI if we got here from kexec down IPI 658 * Some machines need to have at least one cpu in the GIQ,
660 * 659 * so leave the master cpu in the group.
661 * xics doesn't care if we duplicate an EOI as long as we
662 * don't EOI and raise priority.
663 *
664 * probably need to check all the other interrupts too
665 * should we be flagging idle loop instead?
666 * or creating some task to be scheduled?
667 */ 660 */
668 ops->xirr_info_set(cpu, XICS_IPI); 661 if (secondary) {
669 662 /*
670 status = rtas_set_indicator(GLOBAL_INTERRUPT_QUEUE, 663 * we need to EOI the IPI if we got here from kexec down IPI
671 (1UL << interrupt_server_size) - 1 - default_distrib_server, 0); 664 *
672 WARN_ON(status != 0); 665 * probably need to check all the other interrupts too
666 * should we be flagging idle loop instead?
667 * or creating some task to be scheduled?
668 */
669 ops->xirr_info_set(cpu, XICS_IPI);
670 rtas_set_indicator(GLOBAL_INTERRUPT_QUEUE,
671 (1UL << interrupt_server_size) - 1 -
672 default_distrib_server, 0);
673 }
673} 674}
674 675
675#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU 676#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU