sched: Fix rt_rq runtime leakage bug

This patch is to fix the real-time scheduler bug reported at:

  https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/26/13

That is, when running multiple real-time threads on every logical CPUs
and then turning off one CPU, the kernel will bug at function
__disable_runtime().

Function __disable_runtime() bugs and reports leakage of rt_rq runtime.
The root cause is __disable_runtime() assumes it iterates through all
the existing rt_rq's while walking rq->leaf_rt_rq_list, which actually
contains only runnable rt_rq's. This problem also applies to
__enable_runtime() and print_rt_stats().

The patch is based on above analysis, appears to fix the problem, but is
only lightly tested.

Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cheng Xu <chengxu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4DCE1F12.6040609@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

1 files changed, 19 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
index e7cebdc65f8..f8fcf8297c5 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -183,6 +183,14 @@ static inline u64 sched_rt_period(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
         return ktime_to_ns(rt_rq->tg->rt_bandwidth.rt_period);
 }
 
+typedef struct task_group *rt_rq_iter_t;
+
+#define for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, rq) \
+        for (iter = list_entry_rcu(task_groups.next, typeof(*iter), list); \
+             (&iter->list != &task_groups) && \
+             (rt_rq = iter->rt_rq[cpu_of(rq)]); \
+             iter = list_entry_rcu(iter->list.next, typeof(*iter), list))
+
 static inline void list_add_leaf_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
 {
         list_add_rcu(&rt_rq->leaf_rt_rq_list,
@@ -288,6 +296,11 @@ static inline u64 sched_rt_period(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
         return ktime_to_ns(def_rt_bandwidth.rt_period);
 }
 
+typedef struct rt_rq *rt_rq_iter_t;
+
+#define for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, rq) \
+        for ((void) iter, rt_rq = &rq->rt; rt_rq; rt_rq = NULL)
+
 static inline void list_add_leaf_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
 {
 }
@@ -402,12 +415,13 @@ next:
 static void __disable_runtime(struct rq *rq)
 {
         struct root_domain *rd = rq->rd;
+        rt_rq_iter_t iter;
         struct rt_rq *rt_rq;
 
         if (unlikely(!scheduler_running))
                 return;
 
-        for_each_leaf_rt_rq(rt_rq, rq) {
+        for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, rq) {
                 struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b = sched_rt_bandwidth(rt_rq);
                 s64 want;
                 int i;
@@ -487,6 +501,7 @@ static void disable_runtime(struct rq *rq)
 
 static void __enable_runtime(struct rq *rq)
 {
+        rt_rq_iter_t iter;
         struct rt_rq *rt_rq;
 
         if (unlikely(!scheduler_running))
@@ -495,7 +510,7 @@ static void __enable_runtime(struct rq *rq)
         /*
          * Reset each runqueue's bandwidth settings
          */
-        for_each_leaf_rt_rq(rt_rq, rq) {
+        for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, rq) {
                 struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b = sched_rt_bandwidth(rt_rq);
 
                 raw_spin_lock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
@@ -1796,10 +1811,11 @@ extern void print_rt_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct rt_rq *rt_rq);
 
 static void print_rt_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu)
 {
+        rt_rq_iter_t iter;
         struct rt_rq *rt_rq;
 
         rcu_read_lock();
-        for_each_leaf_rt_rq(rt_rq, cpu_rq(cpu))
+        for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, cpu_rq(cpu))
                 print_rt_rq(m, cpu, rt_rq);
         rcu_read_unlock();
 }