ifb: use netif_receive_skb() instead of netif_rx()

In ri_tasklet(), we run from softirq, so can directly handle packet
through netif_receive_skb() instead of netif_rx().
There is no risk of recursion.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/net/ifb.c b/drivers/net/ifb.c
index 8bcacd7c771..124dac4532b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ifb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ifb.c
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static void ri_tasklet(unsigned long dev)
                         dev_queue_xmit(skb);
                 } else if (from & AT_INGRESS) {
                         skb_pull(skb, skb->dev->hard_header_len);
-                        netif_rx(skb);
+                        netif_receive_skb(skb);
                 } else
                         BUG();
         }