diff options
author | Aji Srinivas <emc.com> | 2007-03-07 19:10:53 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2007-03-07 19:10:53 -0500 |
commit | de79059ecd7cd650f3788ece978a64586921d1f1 (patch) | |
tree | d243e26bd799242ddd681e04311f70e40070a4b8 /net/bridge | |
parent | c7ababbdc647e67e953d153ddf62cbdc9fe3297e (diff) |
[BRIDGE]: adding new device to bridge should enable if up
One change introduced by the workqueue removal patch is that adding an
interface that is up to a bridge which is also up does not ever call
br_stp_enable_port(), leaving the port in DISABLED state until we do
ifconfig down and up or link events occur.
The following patch to the br_add_if function fixes it.
This is a regression introduced in 2.6.21.
Submitted-by: Aji_Srinivas@emc.com
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/bridge')
-rw-r--r-- | net/bridge/br_if.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_if.c b/net/bridge/br_if.c index 6845a258408..f3a2e29be40 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_if.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_if.c | |||
@@ -428,6 +428,10 @@ int br_add_if(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_device *dev) | |||
428 | spin_lock_bh(&br->lock); | 428 | spin_lock_bh(&br->lock); |
429 | br_stp_recalculate_bridge_id(br); | 429 | br_stp_recalculate_bridge_id(br); |
430 | br_features_recompute(br); | 430 | br_features_recompute(br); |
431 | |||
432 | if ((dev->flags & IFF_UP) && netif_carrier_ok(dev) && | ||
433 | (br->dev->flags & IFF_UP)) | ||
434 | br_stp_enable_port(p); | ||
431 | spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock); | 435 | spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock); |
432 | 436 | ||
433 | dev_set_mtu(br->dev, br_min_mtu(br)); | 437 | dev_set_mtu(br->dev, br_min_mtu(br)); |