bugfix for memory cgroup controller: migration under memory controller fix

While using memory control cgroup, page-migration under it works as following.
==
 1. uncharge all refs at try to unmap.
 2. charge regs again remove_migration_ptes()
==
This is simple but has following problems.
==
 The page is uncharged and charged back again if *mapped*.
    - This means that cgroup before migration can be different from one after
      migration
    - If page is not mapped but charged as page cache, charge is just ignored
      (because not mapped, it will not be uncharged before migration)
      This is memory leak.
==
This patch tries to keep memory cgroup at page migration by increasing
one refcnt during it. 3 functions are added.

 mem_cgroup_prepare_migration() --- increase refcnt of page->page_cgroup
 mem_cgroup_end_migration()     --- decrease refcnt of page->page_cgroup
 mem_cgroup_page_migration() --- copy page->page_cgroup from old page to
                                 new page.

During migration
  - old page is under PG_locked.
  - new page is under PG_locked, too.
  - both old page and new page is not on LRU.

These 3 facts guarantee that page_cgroup() migration has no race.

Tested and worked well in x86_64/fake-NUMA box.

Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
Cc: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 43 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 3270ce7375d..128f45c16fa 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -492,6 +492,49 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge(struct page_cgroup *pc)
                 }
         }
 }
+/*
+ * Returns non-zero if a page (under migration) has valid page_cgroup member.
+ * Refcnt of page_cgroup is incremented.
+ */
+
+int mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page)
+{
+        struct page_cgroup *pc;
+        int ret = 0;
+        lock_page_cgroup(page);
+        pc = page_get_page_cgroup(page);
+        if (pc && atomic_inc_not_zero(&pc->ref_cnt))
+                ret = 1;
+        unlock_page_cgroup(page);
+        return ret;
+}
+
+void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct page *page)
+{
+        struct page_cgroup *pc = page_get_page_cgroup(page);
+        mem_cgroup_uncharge(pc);
+}
+/*
+ * We know both *page* and *newpage* are now not-on-LRU and Pg_locked.
+ * And no race with uncharge() routines because page_cgroup for *page*
+ * has extra one reference by mem_cgroup_prepare_migration.
+ */
+
+void mem_cgroup_page_migration(struct page *page, struct page *newpage)
+{
+        struct page_cgroup *pc;
+retry:
+        pc = page_get_page_cgroup(page);
+        if (!pc)
+                return;
+        if (clear_page_cgroup(page, pc) != pc)
+                goto retry;
+        pc->page = newpage;
+        lock_page_cgroup(newpage);
+        page_assign_page_cgroup(newpage, pc);
+        unlock_page_cgroup(newpage);
+        return;
+}
 
 int mem_cgroup_write_strategy(char *buf, unsigned long long *tmp)
 {